Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season
Penn State paired 298 primary output with 39.2 efficiency.
Player Stats
Devyn Ford College Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Career production snapshot
- Scrimmage yards
- 908
- Rushing yards
- 765
- Receiving yards
- 143
- Touchdowns
- 7
Season Ledger
Crawlable season-by-season stats
| Season | Team | Games | Scrimmage | Rush Yds | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Postseason | Penn State | 12 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 49.5 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Penn State | 12 | 322 | 292 | 30 | 2 | 49.5 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Penn State | 6 | 298 | 274 | 24 | 3 | 62.4 |
| 2021 Postseason | Penn State | 8 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 24 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Penn State | 8 | 75 | 57 | 18 | 0 | 24 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Penn State | 4 | 68 | 37 | 31 | 0 | 30.9 |
| 2023 Postseason | Notre Dame | 9 | 30 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 35 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 9 | 48 | 14 | 34 | 1 | 35 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 7 | 61 | 55 | 6 | 0 | 25.8 |
Player insights
Supporting note
2024 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 33.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2024 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Penn State, Notre Dame.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Stanford
Win with 20 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 85.7th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2024 Regular Season · Notre Dame
Games
7
Scrimmage Yards / G
8.7
Efficiency
33.1
Usage
3.9
Consistency
39.9
Best Game by takeover score
Stanford
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Texas A&M: 0. Northern Illinois: 6. Purdue: 9. Miami (OH): 21. Louisville: 0. Stanford: 20. Georgia Tech: 5
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas A&M: 1 by 0. Northern Illinois: 2 by 12.5. Purdue: 2 by 46.9. Miami (OH): 5 by 43.8. Stanford: 3 by 69.4. Georgia Tech: 2 by 26
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins9.2 · Games = 6 · +3.2 vs Losses
Losses6 · Games = 1 · -3.2 vs Wins
Next best actions
Keep exploring Devyn Ford
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.