Usage Score
6.9
Player Dossier
2019-2023Oklahoma
TE • 6'6" • 255 lbs • Plano, TX, USA
Austin Stogner reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
6.9
Efficiency
66.1
Consistency
31.2
Season Value
37.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2020 Postseason · Oklahoma
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Austin Stogner, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2020 Postseason · Oklahoma. Austin Stogner reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2020 Postseason
Oklahoma paired 422 primary output with 91.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2023 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 66.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Oklahoma, South Carolina.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: West Virginia
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
17.8
Efficiency
66.1
Usage
6.9
Consistency
31.2
Best Game by takeover score
TCU
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. SMU: 3. Tulsa: 10. Cincinnati: 5. Iowa State: 19. Texas: 24. UCF: 8. Kansas: 12. Oklahoma State: 10. West Virginia: 69. BYU: 10. TCU: 26
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. SMU: 1 by 20. Tulsa: 1 by 66.7. Cincinnati: 1 by 33.3. Iowa State: 1 by 100. Texas: 3 by 53.3. UCF: 1 by 53.3. Kansas: 1 by 80. Oklahoma State: 1 by 66.7. West Virginia: 4 by 100. BYU: 1 by 66.7. TCU: 2 by 86.7
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
West Virginia
Best efficiency game
100 vs West Virginia
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/24 | vs TCU | W 69-45 | — | 2 | 26 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 11/18 | @ BYU | W 31-24 | — | 1 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
| Sun 11/12 | vs West Virginia | W 59-20 | — | 4 | 69 | 17.3 | 17.30 | 1 | 35 |
| Sat 11/4 | @ Oklahoma State | L 24-27 | — | 1 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 10/28 | @ Kansas | L 33-38 | — | 1 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 10/21 | vs UCF | W 31-29 | — | 1 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 10/7 | @ Texas | W 34-30 | — | 3 | 24 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 9/30 | vs Iowa State | W 50-20 | — | 1 | 19 | 19 | 19 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 9/23 | @ Cincinnati | W 20-6 | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 9/16 | @ Tulsa | W 66-17 | — | 1 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 9/9 | vs SMU | W 28-11 | — | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Oklahoma
2019-2023
Opening stop
South Carolina
2022
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Postseason | Oklahoma | 66 | 67.3 | 6.3 | — |
| 2019 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 66 | 67.3 | 6.3 | 0 |
| 2020 Postseason | Oklahoma | 422 | 91.8 | 13.5 | 356 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 422 | 91.8 | 13.5 | 0 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 166 | 66.7 | 6.7 | -256 |
| 2022 Regular Season | South Carolina | 235 | 62.7 | 10.2 | 69 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 196 | 66.1 | 6.9 | -39 |
#1 Featured game
West Virginia
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
69
Primary metric
69 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Kansas State
83
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
83 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Oklahoma State
61
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
61 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Missouri
63
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
63 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Arkansas
68
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
68 receiving yards with a 90.7 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2020 Postseason · Oklahoma
422 primary output · 91.8 efficiency · 13.5 usage
68.9
#2
2020 Regular Season · Oklahoma
68.9
422 primary · 91.8 efficiency · 13.5 usage
#3
2019 Postseason · Oklahoma
40.1
66 primary · 67.3 efficiency · 6.3 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2019 · Rating 0.9467
Prestonwood Christian · Plano, TX
Career Facts
2
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
1,085
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 44 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Austin Stogner quick answers
Recruiting profile
4-star recruit