Usage Score
5.6
Player Dossier
2019-2023Texas Tech
Baylor Cupp
TE • 6'6" • 260 lbs • Brock, TX, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Baylor Cupp reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
59.3
Consistency
41.4
Season Value
47.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season · Texas Tech
1920212223
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Texas A&M • Texas Tech
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Texas
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Baylor Cupp, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season · Texas Tech. Baylor Cupp reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Baylor Cupp played TE for Texas A&M and Texas Tech. Across 5 tracked seasons, Baylor Cupp recorded 246 receiving yards, 2 tackles, and 4 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2022 with Texas Tech.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season
Texas Tech paired 114 primary output with 59.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2023 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 59.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Texas A&M, Texas Tech.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Baylor
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2023 Regular Season · Texas Tech
Games
10
Receiving Yards / G
11.4
Efficiency
59.3
Usage
5.6
Consistency
41.4
Best Game by takeover score
Texas
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Oregon: 6. West Virginia: 12. Houston: 4. Baylor: 34. Kansas State: 7. BYU: 7. TCU: 19. Kansas: 8. UCF: 17. Texas: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oregon: 1 by 40. West Virginia: 1 by 80. Houston: 1 by 26.7. Baylor: 2 by 100. Kansas State: 1 by 46.7. BYU: 1 by 46.7. TCU: 1 by 100. Kansas: 1 by 53.3. UCF: 1 by 100. Texas: 1 by 0
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins16.4 · Games = 5 · +10.0 vs Losses
Losses6.4 · Games = 5 · -10.0 vs Wins
First Half12.6 · Games = 5 · +2.4 vs Second Half
Second Half10.2 · Games = 5 · -2.4 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Baylor
Best efficiency game
100 vs UCF
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/25 | @ Texas | L 7-57 | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 11/18 | vs UCF | W 24-23 | — | 1 | 17 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 11/11 | @ Kansas | W 16-13 | — | 1 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Thu 11/2 | vs TCU | W 35-28 | — | 1 | 19 | 19 | 19 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 10/21 | @ BYU | L 14-27 | — | 1 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 10/14 | vs Kansas State | L 21-38 | — | 1 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| Sun 10/8 | @ Baylor2+ TD | W 39-14 | — | 2 | 34 | 17 | 17 | 2 | 18 |
| Sat 9/30 | vs Houston | W 49-28 | — | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 9/23 | @ West Virginia | L 13-20 | — | 1 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 9/9 | vs Oregon | L 30-38 | — | 1 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Texas A&M
2019-2021
Opening stop
- 2
Texas Tech
2022-2023
Final stop
Season Progression
20192020202120222023
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2020 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Texas Tech | 132 | 54.2 | 6.2 | 132 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Texas Tech | 114 | 59.3 | 5.6 | -18 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Texas
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
65
Primary metric
65 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Baylor
34
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
34 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
TCU
19
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
19 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
UCF
17
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
17 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Unknown
20
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
20 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2023 Regular Season · Texas Tech
114 primary output · 59.3 efficiency · 5.6 usage
47.4
#2
2022 Regular Season · Texas Tech
46.3
132 primary · 54.2 efficiency · 6.2 usage
#3
2019 Regular Season · Texas A&M
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2019 · Rating 0.9731
Brock · Brock, TX
- Committed To
- Texas A&M
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2019
Career Facts
2
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
246
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 18 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.