Usage Score
9.7
Player Dossier
2018-2019Akron
Brandon Lee
WR • 5'6" • 158 lbs • Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Brandon Lee reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
43.3
Consistency
34.3
Season Value
31.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · Akron
1819
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 2
- Program Path
- Akron
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: UAB
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Brandon Lee, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · Akron. Brandon Lee reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Brandon Lee played WR for Akron. Across 2 tracked seasons, Brandon Lee recorded 179 rushing yards, 115 receiving yards, and 4 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2019 with Akron.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season
Akron paired 115 primary output with 43.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 43.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2019 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UAB
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Regular Season · Akron
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
10.5
Efficiency
43.3
Usage
9.7
Consistency
34.3
Best Game by takeover score
Miami (OH)
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Illinois: 12. UAB: 61. Central Michigan: 0. Troy: 11. Massachusetts: 15. Kent State: 12. Buffalo: 0. Northern Illinois: 0. Bowling Green: 6. Eastern Michigan: -2. Miami (OH): 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Illinois: 1 by 80. UAB: 4 by 100. Central Michigan: 2 by 0. Troy: 2 by 36.7. Massachusetts: 2 by 50. Kent State: 2 by 40. Bowling Green: 1 by 40. Eastern Michigan: 1 by 0
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Losses10.5 · Games = 11
First Half18.5 · Games = 6 · +17.7 vs Second Half
Second Half0.8 · Games = 5 · -17.7 vs First Half
All Games10.5 · Games = 11
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
UAB
Best efficiency game
100 vs UAB
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 11/21 | @ Miami (OH) | L 17-20 | — | — | — | 2 | — | — | — |
| Tue 11/12 | vs Eastern Michigan | L 14-42 | — | 1 | -2 | 1.5 | -2 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 11/2 | @ Bowling Green | L 6-35 | — | 1 | 6 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 10/26 | @ Northern Illinois | L 0-49 | — | — | — | 7.6 | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/19 | vs Buffalo | L 0-21 | — | — | — | -1 | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/12 | vs Kent State | L 3-26 | — | 2 | 12 | 0.9 | 6 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 9/28 | @ Massachusetts | L 29-37 | — | 2 | 15 | 2.5 | 7.50 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 9/21 | vs Troy | L 7-35 | — | 2 | 11 | 6.1 | 5.50 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 9/14 | @ Central Michigan | L 24-45 | — | 2 | 0 | 1.3 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs UAB | L 20-31 | — | 4 | 61 | 6.9 | 15.30 | 0 | 48 |
| Sat 8/31 | @ Illinois | L 3-42 | — | 1 | 12 | 4.2 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Akron
2018-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
20182019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Regular Season | Akron | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2019 Regular Season | Akron | 115 | 43.3 | 9.7 | 115 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
UAB
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
61
Primary metric
61 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Illinois
12
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
12 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
#3
Massachusetts
15
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
15 receiving yards with a 50 efficiency score.
#4
Kent State
12
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
12 receiving yards with a 40 efficiency score.
#5
Troy
11
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
11 receiving yards with a 36.7 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2019 Regular Season · Akron
115 primary output · 43.3 efficiency · 9.7 usage
31.5
#2
2018 Regular Season · Akron
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2024 · Rating 0.7883
North Florida Christian · Tallahassee, FL
- Committed To
- UTEP
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2024
Career Facts
1
Career teams
2
Seasons tracked
115
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 2 tracked seasons, 11 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.