Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season
Oregon State paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Player Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Regular Season | Oregon State | 10 | - | 0 | 0 | 100 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Oregon State | 5 | - | 0 | 0 | 100 |
| 2021 Postseason | Oregon State | 13 | - | 0 | 0 | 100 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Oregon State | 13 | - | 0 | 0 | 100 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Oregon State | 11 | - | 0 | 0 | 100 |
| 2023 Postseason | Oregon State | 6 | 1 | 17 | 0 | 71.3 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Oregon State | 6 | 6 | 96 | 2 | 71.3 |
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season
Oregon State paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2023 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 87.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Stanford
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
6
Receiving Yards / G
18.8
Efficiency
87.2
Usage
6.5
Consistency
76.1
Best Game by takeover score
Stanford
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Notre Dame: 17. San José State: 22. UC Davis: 25. Washington State: 15. Stanford: 28. Oregon: 6
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Notre Dame: 1 by 100. San José State: 1 by 100. UC Davis: 2 by 83.3. Washington State: 1 by 100. Stanford: 1 by 100. Oregon: 1 by 40
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.