Player Stats

Xavier Johnson College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
329
Receptions
26
Touchdowns
3

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2018 Regular SeasonOhio State0-00-
2019 Regular SeasonOhio State2-00100
2020 Regular SeasonOhio State2-0050.1
2021 PostseasonOhio State5-00100
2021 Regular SeasonOhio State5-00100
2022 PostseasonOhio State11343152.3
2022 Regular SeasonOhio State1110108252.3
2023 PostseasonOhio State13231055.9
2023 Regular SeasonOhio State1311147055.9

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season

Ohio State paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.

Supporting note

2023 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 63 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Missouri

Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 90.9th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2023 Postseason · Ohio State

Games

13

Receiving Yards / G

13.7

Efficiency

63

Usage

6.7

Consistency

38.2

Best Game by takeover score

Missouri

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Missouri: 31. Indiana: 0. Youngstown State: 6. Western Kentucky: 0. Notre Dame: 40. Maryland: 12. Purdue: 21. Penn State: 6. Wisconsin: 0. Rutgers: 0. Michigan State: 31. Minnesota: 22. Michigan: 9

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Missouri: 2 by 100. Youngstown State: 1 by 40. Western Kentucky: 1 by 0. Notre Dame: 1 by 100. Maryland: 1 by 80. Purdue: 1 by 100. Penn State: 1 by 40. Rutgers: 1 by 0. Michigan State: 1 by 100. Minnesota: 2 by 73.3. Michigan: 1 by 60

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins12.5 · Games = 11 · -7.5 vs Losses
Losses20 · Games = 2 · +7.5 vs Wins