Player Stats

Wayne Toussant College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
265
Receptions
18
Touchdowns
2

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2018 Regular SeasonLouisiana Tech2253045.9
2019 PostseasonLouisiana Tech9-0034
2019 Regular SeasonLouisiana Tech9226034
2020 PostseasonLouisiana Tech1014052.9
2020 Regular SeasonLouisiana Tech1013182252.9

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2020 Postseason

Louisiana Tech paired 186 primary output with 56.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

2020 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 56.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2020 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Houston Christian

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2020 Postseason · Louisiana Tech

Games

10

Receiving Yards / G

18.6

Efficiency

56.7

Usage

9

Consistency

25

Best Game by takeover score

Houston Christian

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Georgia Southern: 4. Southern Miss: 0. Houston Christian: 91. BYU: 30. UTEP: 9. Marshall: 0. UTSA: 0. UAB: 27. North Texas: 0. TCU: 25

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Georgia Southern: 1 by 26.7. Houston Christian: 3 by 100. BYU: 3 by 66.7. UTEP: 1 by 60. Marshall: 1 by 0. UAB: 3 by 60. TCU: 2 by 83.3

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins25.4 · Games = 5 · +13.6 vs Losses
Losses11.8 · Games = 5 · -13.6 vs Wins