Usage Score
2.6
Player Dossier
2019-2022Louisiana Tech
DJ Jackson
DL • 6'0" • 308 lbs • Dallas, TX, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
DJ Jackson shows a ball-hunting defender profile with partial disruption data.
Efficiency
7.4
Consistency
3
Season Value
4.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2020 Postseason · Louisiana Tech
1920202122
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Louisiana Tech
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: UTSA
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
DJ Jackson, DL. Best season Best season by value score: 2020 Postseason · Louisiana Tech. DJ Jackson shows a ball-hunting defender profile with partial disruption data.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2020 Postseason
Louisiana Tech paired 0 primary output with 8.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2021 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 7.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2022 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UTSA
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2021 Regular Season · Louisiana Tech
Games
11
Havoc Plays / G
0.1
Efficiency
7.4
Usage
2.6
Consistency
3
Best Game by takeover score
Rice
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Mississippi State: 0. Unknown: 0. SMU: 0. NC State: 0. UTEP: 0. UTSA: 1. Old Dominion: 0. UAB: 0. Charlotte: 0. Southern Miss: 0. Rice: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Mississippi State: 1 by 4.2. Unknown: 1 by 4.2. SMU: 3 by 12.5. NC State: 2 by 8.3. UTEP: 2 by 8.3. UTSA: 2 by 18.3. Old Dominion: 1 by 4.2. UAB: 1 by 4.2. Charlotte: 1 by 4.2. Southern Miss: 1 by 4.2. Rice: 2 by 8.3
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Losses0.1 · Games = 9
First Half0.2 · Games = 6 · +0.2 vs Second Half
Second Half0 · Games = 5 · -0.2 vs First Half
All Games0.1 · Games = 11
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
UTSA
Best efficiency game
18.3 vs UTSA
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/27 | @ Rice | L 31-35 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/20 | vs Southern Miss | L 19-35 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/13 | vs Charlotte | W 42-32 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/6 | @ UAB | L 38-52 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/30 | @ Old Dominion | L 20-23 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/23 | vs UTSA | L 16-45 | 2 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/17 | @ UTEP | L 3-19 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/2 | @ NC State | L 27-34 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/18 | vs SMU | L 37-39 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/11 | vs Unknown | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/4 | @ Mississippi State | L 34-35 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Louisiana Tech
2019-2022
Opening stop
Season Progression
20192020202020212022
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Regular Season | Louisiana Tech | 0 | 4.2 | 0.6 | — |
| 2020 Postseason | Louisiana Tech | 0 | 8.3 | 1.6 | 0 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Louisiana Tech | 0 | 8.3 | 1.6 | 0 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Louisiana Tech | 1 | 7.4 | 2.6 | 1 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Louisiana Tech | 0 | — | — | -1 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
UTSA
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1
Primary metric
1 disruption/tackle impact with 45.5 takeover score.
#2
Georgia Southern
0
Primary metric
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 4.9 takeover score.
#3
SMU
0
Primary metric
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 4.7 takeover score.
#4
TCU
0
Primary metric
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 3.4 takeover score.
#5
NC State
0
Primary metric
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 3.3 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2020 Postseason · Louisiana Tech
0 primary output · 8.3 efficiency · 1.6 usage
36.7
#2
2020 Regular Season · Louisiana Tech
36.7
0 primary · 8.3 efficiency · 1.6 usage
#3
2019 Regular Season · Louisiana Tech
34.9
0 primary · 4.2 efficiency · 0.6 usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2018 · Rating 0.7903
West Mesquite · Mesquite, TX
- Committed To
- Louisiana Tech
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2018
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
29
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 20 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.