Player Stats

Justin Henderson College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
1,678
Rushing yards
1,427
Receiving yards
251
Touchdowns
18

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2017 Regular SeasonLouisiana Tech00000-
2018 Regular SeasonLouisiana Tech512711314033.2
2019 PostseasonLouisiana Tech1399954078.6
2019 Regular SeasonLouisiana Tech131,1639671961678.6
2020 Regular SeasonLouisiana Tech728925237244.4

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason

Louisiana Tech paired 1,262 primary output with 57.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

2020 Regular Season role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 32.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2020 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Southern Miss

Win with 77 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2020 Regular Season · Louisiana Tech

Games

7

Scrimmage Yards / G

41.3

Efficiency

32.9

Usage

21.2

Consistency

61.4

Best Game by takeover score

Southern Miss

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Southern Miss: 77. Houston Christian: 77. BYU: 45. UTEP: 62. Marshall: 16. UTSA: 16. UAB: -4

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Southern Miss: 22 by 38.5. Houston Christian: 11 by 72.9. BYU: 16 by 25.7. UTEP: 16 by 38.6. Marshall: 11 by 15.2. UTSA: 4 by 39.6. UAB: 4 by 0

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins53 · Games = 4 · +27.3 vs Losses
Losses25.7 · Games = 3 · -27.3 vs Wins