Player Stats

BeeJay Williamson College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
200
TFL
7
Sacks
1.5
QB hurries
1
Passes defended
8
Touchdowns
2

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2018 Regular SeasonLouisiana Tech11-0--037
2019 PostseasonLouisiana Tech122-0--014.8
2019 Regular SeasonLouisiana Tech12311.50.5--014.8
2020 PostseasonLouisiana Tech10411--061.1
2020 Regular SeasonLouisiana Tech10521013061.1
2021 Regular SeasonLouisiana Tech11522.50-2247.5
2022 Regular SeasonLouisiana Tech85810-3050

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2020 Postseason

Louisiana Tech paired 10 primary output with 33.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

2022 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 36.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2022 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Missouri

Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 87.5th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2022 Regular Season · Louisiana Tech

Games

8

Havoc Plays / G

0.6

Efficiency

36.5

Usage

8.4

Consistency

43.3

Best Game by takeover score

Missouri

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Missouri: 1. Clemson: 0. South Alabama: 0. UTEP: 1. North Texas: 1. Florida International: 2. Middle Tennessee: 0. UAB: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Missouri: 11 by 55.8. Clemson: 8 by 33.3. South Alabama: 9 by 37.5. UTEP: 10 by 51.7. North Texas: 7 by 39.2. Florida International: 5 by 40.8. Middle Tennessee: 3 by 12.5. UAB: 5 by 20.8

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.5 · Games = 2 · -0.2 vs Losses
Losses0.7 · Games = 6 · +0.2 vs Wins