Player Stats

Jarreth Sterns College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
1,902
Receptions
150
Touchdowns
17

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2021 PostseasonWestern Kentucky1413184388.4
2021 Regular SeasonWestern Kentucky141371,7181488.4

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason

Western Kentucky paired 1,902 primary output with 80.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

2021 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 80.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2021 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Old Dominion

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2021 Postseason · Western Kentucky

Games

14

Receiving Yards / G

135.9

Efficiency

80.1

Usage

30.7

Consistency

73.4

Best Game by takeover score

Old Dominion

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011121314

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. App State: 184. UT Martin: 107. Army: 171. Indiana: 82. Michigan State: 186. UTSA: 195. Old Dominion: 221. Florida International: 115. Charlotte: 89. Middle Tennessee: 110. Rice: 92. Florida Atlantic: 143. Marshall: 28. UTSA: 179

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. App State: 13 by 94.4. UT Martin: 7 by 100. Army: 9 by 100. Indiana: 7 by 78.1. Michigan State: 17 by 72.9. UTSA: 16 by 81.3. Old Dominion: 13 by 100. Florida International: 14 by 54.8. Charlotte: 10 by 59.3. Middle Tennessee: 11 by 66.7. Rice: 7 by 87.6. Florida Atlantic: 12 by 79.4. Marshall: 4 by 46.7. UTSA: 10 by 100

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins121 · Games = 9 · -41.6 vs Losses
Losses162.6 · Games = 5 · +41.6 vs Wins