Usage Score
22.7
Player Dossier
2017-2020Air Force
Ben Peterson
WR • 5'9" • 180 lbs • Bellingham, WA, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Ben Peterson reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
100
Consistency
32.1
Season Value
59.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · Air Force
1718191920
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Air Force
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Utah State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Ben Peterson, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · Air Force. Ben Peterson reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season
Air Force paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2020 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 100 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2020 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Utah State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2020 Regular Season · Air Force
Games
4
Receiving Yards / G
23.8
Efficiency
100
Usage
22.7
Consistency
32.1
Best Game by takeover score
Army
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. San José State: 0. Boise State: 0. Utah State: 73. Army: 22
Volume vs Efficiency
Scatter view is hidden because this season does not have enough game-to-game variety yet.
Split Comparison
Losses7.3 · n=3
First Half0 · n=2 · -47.5 vs Second Half
Second Half47.5 · n=2 · +47.5 vs First Half
All Games23.8 · n=4
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
4 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Utah State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Army
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Air Force
2017-2020
Opening stop
Season Progression
20172018201920192020
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Regular Season | Air Force | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2018 Regular Season | Air Force | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2019 Postseason | Air Force | 25 | 55.5 | 19.2 | 25 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Air Force | 25 | 55.5 | 19.2 | 0 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Air Force | 95 | 100 | 22.7 | 70 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Utah State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
73
Primary metric
73 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
San José State
9
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
9 receiving yards with a 60 efficiency score.
#3
Washington State
8
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
8 receiving yards with a 53.3 efficiency score.
#4
Boise State
8
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
8 receiving yards with a 53.3 efficiency score.
#5
Army
22
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
22 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2018 Regular Season · Air Force
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2020 Regular Season · Air Force
59.3
95 primary · 100 efficiency · 22.7 usage
#3
2019 Postseason · Air Force
26.9
25 primary · 55.5 efficiency · 19.2 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2019 · Rating 0.82
Dixon · Dixon, CA
- Committed To
- Air Force
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2019
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
120
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 14 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.