Player Stats

Mekhi Sargent College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
2,040
Rushing yards
1,740
Receiving yards
300
Touchdowns
21

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2017 Regular SeasonIowa00000-
2018 PostseasonIowa131-34066.1
2018 Regular SeasonIowa139007481521066.1
2019 PostseasonIowa1320200060.7
2019 Regular SeasonIowa13681543138460.7
2020 Regular SeasonIowa84384326756.6

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason

Iowa paired 901 primary output with 45 efficiency.

Supporting note

2020 Regular Season role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 56.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2020 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Penn State

Win with 101 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2020 Regular Season · Iowa

Games

8

Scrimmage Yards / G

54.8

Efficiency

56.3

Usage

18.3

Consistency

69.3

Best Game by takeover score

Penn State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Purdue: 71. Northwestern: 26. Michigan State: 31. Minnesota: 86. Penn State: 101. Nebraska: 18. Illinois: 54. Wisconsin: 51

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Purdue: 11 by 67.2. Northwestern: 5 by 52.9. Michigan State: 9 by 35.9. Minnesota: 9 by 89.8. Penn State: 15 by 70.1. Nebraska: 5 by 37.5. Illinois: 10 by 56.3. Wisconsin: 13 by 40.9

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins56.8 · Games = 6 · +8.3 vs Losses
Losses48.5 · Games = 2 · -8.3 vs Wins