Player Stats

Channing Tindall College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
106
TFL
15
Sacks
12
QB hurries
2

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2018 Regular SeasonGeorgia91732--023.8
2019 Regular SeasonGeorgia691.51.5--017
2020 PostseasonGeorgia71-0--027
2020 Regular SeasonGeorgia71233--027
2021 PostseasonGeorgia1591.51--050.3
2021 Regular SeasonGeorgia155864.52-050.3

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason

Georgia paired 15 primary output with 27.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

2021 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 27.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2021 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Tennessee

Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2021 Postseason · Georgia

Games

15

Havoc Plays / G

1

Efficiency

27.3

Usage

7.3

Consistency

13.3

Best Game by takeover score

Tennessee

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112131415

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Alabama: 2.5. Michigan: 0. Clemson: 0. UAB: 2. South Carolina: 0. Vanderbilt: 0. Arkansas: 1. Auburn: 0. Kentucky: 0. Florida: 0.5. Missouri: 0. Tennessee: 7. Charleston Southern: 1. Georgia Tech: 0. Alabama: 1

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Alabama: 8 by 58.3. Michigan: 1 by 4.2. Clemson: 3 by 12.5. UAB: 7 by 49.2. South Carolina: 7 by 29.2. Vanderbilt: 2 by 8.3. Arkansas: 5 by 30.8. Auburn: 5 by 20.8. Kentucky: 4 by 16.7. Florida: 7 by 34.2. Missouri: 5 by 20.8. Tennessee: 8 by 83.3. Charleston Southern: 2 by 18.3. Georgia Tech: 2 by 8.3. Alabama: 1 by 14.2

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins1 · Games = 14 · +0 vs Losses
Losses1 · Games = 1 · +0 vs Wins