Usage Score
13
Player Dossier
2018-2020Georgia
Azeez Ojulari
LB • 6'3" • 240 lbs • Marietta, GA, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Azeez Ojulari shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 35.9 disruption score.
Efficiency
35.9
Consistency
59.4
Season Value
46.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2020 Postseason · Georgia
181819192020
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Georgia
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Cincinnati
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Azeez Ojulari, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2020 Postseason · Georgia. Azeez Ojulari shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 35.9 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2020 Postseason
Georgia paired 24 primary output with 35.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2020 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 35.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2020 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Cincinnati
Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2020 Postseason · Georgia
Games
10
Havoc Plays / G
2.4
Efficiency
35.9
Usage
13
Consistency
59.4
Best Game by takeover score
Cincinnati
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Cincinnati: 6. Arkansas: 0. Auburn: 4. Tennessee: 4. Alabama: 2. Kentucky: 3. Florida: 0. Mississippi State: 2. South Carolina: 2. Missouri: 1
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Cincinnati: 4 by 66.7. Arkansas: 2 by 8.3. Auburn: 5 by 60.8. Tennessee: 5 by 60.8. Alabama: 2 by 28.3. Kentucky: 3 by 42.5. Florida: 5 by 20.8. Mississippi State: 2 by 28.3. South Carolina: 1 by 24.2. Missouri: 2 by 18.3
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins2.8 · Games = 8 · +1.8 vs Losses
Losses1 · Games = 2 · -1.8 vs Wins
First Half3.2 · Games = 5 · +1.6 vs Second Half
Second Half1.6 · Games = 5 · -1.6 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Cincinnati
Best efficiency game
66.7 vs Cincinnati
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 1/1 | vs Cincinnati2+ sacks · Splash game | W 24-21 | 4 | 4 | — | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 12/12 | @ Missouri | W 49-14 | 2 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/29 | @ South Carolina | W 45-16 | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/22 | vs Mississippi State | W 31-24 | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/7 | vs Florida | L 28-44 | 5 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/31 | @ Kentucky | W 14-3 | 3 | 1 | — | 1.50 | 1.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/18 | @ Alabama | L 24-41 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 10/10 | vs Tennessee2+ sacks · Splash game | W 44-21 | 5 | 3 | — | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/3 | vs AuburnSplash game | W 27-6 | 5 | 3 | — | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/26 | @ Arkansas | W 37-10 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Georgia
2018-2020
Opening stop
Season Progression
201820182019201920202020
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Postseason | Georgia | 1 | 13.4 | 13.8 | — |
| 2018 Regular Season | Georgia | 1 | 13.4 | 13.8 | 0 |
| 2019 Postseason | Georgia | 10.5 | 20.9 | 8 | 9.5 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Georgia | 10.5 | 20.9 | 8 | 0 |
| 2020 Postseason | Georgia | 24 | 35.9 | 13 | 13.5 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Georgia | 24 | 35.9 | 13 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Cincinnati
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
6
Primary metric
6 disruption/tackle impact with 61.9 takeover score.
#2
Tennessee
4
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 56.6 takeover score.
#3
Auburn
4
Primary metric
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 51.3 takeover score.
#4
Tennessee
4
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 50.1 takeover score.
#5
Middle Tennessee
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 46.6 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2020 Postseason · Georgia
24 primary output · 35.9 efficiency · 13 usage
46.4
#2
2020 Regular Season · Georgia
46.4
24 primary · 35.9 efficiency · 13 usage
#3
2019 Postseason · Georgia
24.6
10.5 primary · 20.9 efficiency · 8 usage
Milestones
1
Impact games
4
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2018 · Rating 0.9391
Marietta · Marietta, GA
- Committed To
- Georgia
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2018
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
70
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 24 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.