Usage / Role
3%
Rotational offensive role
Player Dossier
2018-2018UTSA
TE • 6'2" • Scottsdale, AZ, USA
Carter McCarthy reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage / Role
3%
Rotational offensive role
Impact Production
16
Developing production for a tight end
Reliability
11
Sporadic game-to-game production
Star Power
28
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2018 Regular Season · UTSA
Snapshot
Carter McCarthy, TE. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2018 Regular Season · UTSA. Carter McCarthy reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Regular Season | UTSA | 5 | 6 | 52 | 1 | 55.9 |
Related Context
Carter McCarthy played TE for UTSA. Across 1 tracked season, Carter McCarthy recorded -6 rushing yards, 52 receiving yards, and 1 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2018 with UTSA.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season
UTSA paired 52 primary output with 53.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 53.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UTEP
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
5
Receiving Yards / G
10.4
Efficiency
53.3
Usage
6.6
Consistency
48.4
Best Game by takeover score
UTEP
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Baylor: 5. Kansas State: 3. UTEP: 24. Louisiana Tech: 12. UAB: 8
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Baylor: 1 by 33.3. Kansas State: 1 by 20. UTEP: 2 by 80. Louisiana Tech: 1 by 80. UAB: 1 by 53.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
5 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
UTEP
Best efficiency game
80 vs Louisiana Tech
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
UTSA
2018
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Regular Season | UTSA | 52 | 53.3 | 6.6 | — |
#1 Featured game
vs UTEP
Week 5 · W 30-21 · Conference game
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
24
Receiving Yards
71.1 takeover
24 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
#2
vs Louisiana Tech
Week 7 · L 3-31 · Conference game
12
Receiving Yards
49.2 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
12 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
#3
@ UAB
Week 10 · L 3-52 · Conference game
8
Receiving Yards
36.3 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
8 receiving yards with a 53.3 efficiency score.
#4
vs Baylor
Week 2 · L 20-37
5
Receiving Yards
24.3 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
5 receiving yards with a 33.3 efficiency score.
#5
@ Kansas State
Week 3 · L 17-41
3
Receiving Yards
16.7 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
3 receiving yards with a 20 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2018 Regular Season · UTSA
52 primary output · 53.3 efficiency · 6.6 usage
55.9
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.