Player Stats

Roderic Burns College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
2,125
Receptions
153
Touchdowns
9

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2019 Regular SeasonNorth Texas1219046.1
2020 PostseasonNorth Texas7545034.3
2020 Regular SeasonNorth Texas77116034.3
2021 PostseasonNorth Texas13487082.3
2021 Regular SeasonNorth Texas1354715482.3
2022 PostseasonNorth Texas13326070
2022 Regular SeasonNorth Texas1337650170
2023 Regular SeasonNorth Texas1141467452.2

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason

North Texas paired 802 primary output with 77.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

2023 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 59.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2023 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Louisiana Tech

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2023 Regular Season · North Texas

Games

11

Receiving Yards / G

42.5

Efficiency

59.7

Usage

16

Consistency

37.5

Best Game by takeover score

Louisiana Tech

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. California: 26. Florida International: 54. Louisiana Tech: 134. Abilene Christian: 1. Navy: 39. Temple: 21. Tulane: 54. Memphis: 102. SMU: 1. Tulsa: 18. UAB: 17

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. California: 4 by 43.3. Florida International: 4 by 90. Louisiana Tech: 11 by 81.2. Abilene Christian: 1 by 6.7. Navy: 5 by 52. Temple: 2 by 70. Tulane: 4 by 90. Memphis: 5 by 100. SMU: 1 by 6.7. Tulsa: 2 by 60. UAB: 2 by 56.7

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins38.2 · Games = 5 · -7.8 vs Losses
Losses46 · Games = 6 · +7.8 vs Wins