Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season
New Mexico paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Player Stats
Andrew Erickson College Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Career production snapshot
- Receiving yards
- 781
- Receptions
- 63
- Touchdowns
- 4
Season Ledger
Crawlable season-by-season stats
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Regular Season | New Mexico | 1 | - | 0 | 0 | 100 |
| 2020 Regular Season | New Mexico | 7 | 18 | 270 | 2 | 74.1 |
| 2021 Regular Season | New Mexico | 9 | 13 | 138 | 1 | 45.9 |
| 2022 Regular Season | New Mexico | 7 | 12 | 110 | 0 | 48.7 |
| 2023 Regular Season | New Mexico | 9 | 20 | 263 | 1 | 72.7 |
Player insights
Supporting note
2023 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 75.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2023 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Massachusetts
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2023 Regular Season · New Mexico
Games
9
Receiving Yards / G
29.2
Efficiency
75.8
Usage
14.2
Consistency
70.5
Best Game by takeover score
Massachusetts
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Texas A&M: 12. Tennessee Tech: 29. New Mexico State: 38. Massachusetts: 61. Hawai'i: 31. Nevada: 30. UNLV: 15. Fresno State: 5. Utah State: 42
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas A&M: 2 by 40. Tennessee Tech: 3 by 64.4. New Mexico State: 3 by 84.4. Massachusetts: 2 by 100. Hawai'i: 2 by 100. Nevada: 3 by 66.7. UNLV: 1 by 100. Fresno State: 1 by 33.3. Utah State: 3 by 93.3
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins31.5 · Games = 4 · +4.1 vs Losses
Losses27.4 · Games = 5 · -4.1 vs Wins
Next best actions
Keep exploring Andrew Erickson
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.