Usage Score
21.2
Player Dossier
2018-2022New Mexico
Dylan Horton
DL • 6'4" • 275 lbs • Frisco, TX, USA
High-volume tacklerDown-to-down presence
Dylan Horton shows a high-volume tackler profile with 30.6 disruption score.
Efficiency
30.6
Consistency
39.9
Season Value
35.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason · TCU
18192021212222
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- New Mexico • TCU
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Michigan
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Dylan Horton, DL. Best season Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason · TCU. Dylan Horton shows a high-volume tackler profile with 30.6 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason
TCU paired 26.5 primary output with 30.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 30.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2022 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across New Mexico, TCU.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Michigan
Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2022 Postseason · TCU
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
2.0
Efficiency
30.6
Usage
21.2
Consistency
39.9
Best Game by takeover score
Michigan
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Michigan: 8. Colorado: 0. Unknown: 1.5. SMU: 0. Oklahoma: 0. Oklahoma State: 3. Kansas State: 0. West Virginia: 4. Texas Tech: 1. Texas: 2. Baylor: 2. Iowa State: 1. Kansas State: 4
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Michigan: 4 by 66.7. Colorado: 1 by 4.2. Unknown: 2 by 23.3. SMU: 4 by 16.7. Oklahoma: 4 by 16.7. Oklahoma State: 2 by 38.3. Kansas State: 1 by 4.2. West Virginia: 5 by 60.8. Texas Tech: 3 by 22.5. Texas: 5 by 40.8. Baylor: 5 by 40.8. Iowa State: 1 by 14.2. Kansas State: 2 by 48.3
Split Comparison
Wins1.9 · n=11
First Half1.8 · n=7 · -0.5 vs Second Half
Second Half2.3 · n=6 · +0.5 vs First Half
All Games2.0 · n=13
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Michigan
Best efficiency game
66.7 vs Michigan
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/31 | @ Michigan2+ sacks · Splash game | W 51-45 | 4 | 4 | — | 4 | 4 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 12/3 | vs Kansas State2+ sacks · Splash game | L 28-31 | 2 | 2 | — | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/26 | vs Iowa State | W 62-14 | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/19 | @ Baylor | W 29-28 | 5 | 3 | — | 1.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/13 | @ Texas | W 17-10 | 5 | 3 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/5 | vs Texas Tech | W 34-24 | 3 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/29 | @ West Virginia2+ sacks · Splash game | W 41-31 | 5 | 4 | — | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/23 | vs Kansas State | W 38-28 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/15 | vs Oklahoma State | W 43-40 | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 10/1 | vs Oklahoma | W 55-24 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/24 | @ SMU | W 42-34 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/11 | vs Unknown | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/3 | @ Colorado | W 38-13 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
New Mexico
2018-2021
Opening stop
- 2
TCU
2020-2022
Final stop
Season Progression
2018201920202021202120222022
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Regular Season | New Mexico | 2.5 | 8.8 | 2.6 | — |
| 2019 Regular Season | New Mexico | 5 | 29.2 | 10.3 | 2.5 |
| 2020 Regular Season | TCU | 2 | 10.7 | 2.5 | -3 |
| 2021 Regular Season | TCU | 13 | 28.5 | 13.8 | 11 |
| 2021 Regular Season | New Mexico | 13 | 28.5 | 13.8 | 0 |
| 2022 Postseason | TCU | 26.5 | 30.6 | 21.2 | 13.5 |
| 2022 Regular Season | TCU | 26.5 | 30.6 | 21.2 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Michigan
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
8
Primary metric
8 disruption/tackle impact with 88.9 takeover score.
#2
Texas
4
Primary metric
Loss with backfield disruption leading the way.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 72.3 takeover score.
#3
Unknown
3
Primary metric
Game with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 60.1 takeover score.
#4
Kansas State
4
Primary metric
Loss with backfield disruption leading the way.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 55 takeover score.
#5
West Virginia
4
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 47.6 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2022 Postseason · TCU
26.5 primary output · 30.6 efficiency · 21.2 usage
35.7
#2
2022 Regular Season · TCU
35.7
26.5 primary · 30.6 efficiency · 21.2 usage
#3
2021 Regular Season · TCU
29.4
13 primary · 28.5 efficiency · 13.8 usage
Milestones
3
Impact games
5
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2018 · Rating 0.8104
Frisco · Frisco, TX
- Committed To
- New Mexico
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2018
Career Facts
2
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
134
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 44 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.