Player Stats

Luke Cameron College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
61
TFL
2.5
Sacks
0.5
QB hurries
2
Passes defended
2

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2020 Regular SeasonEastern Michigan56-01-013.6
2021 Regular SeasonEastern Michigan71910--015.6
2022 PostseasonEastern Michigan90-0-1037.4
2022 Regular SeasonEastern Michigan9131.50.5--037.4
2023 PostseasonEastern Michigan107-0--021.2
2023 Regular SeasonEastern Michigan1016-011021.2

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason

Eastern Michigan paired 4 primary output with 10.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

2023 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 11.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Howard

Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2023 Postseason · Eastern Michigan

Games

10

Havoc Plays / G

0.2

Efficiency

11.6

Usage

2

Consistency

6.7

Best Game by takeover score

Howard

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. South Alabama: 0. Howard: 1. Minnesota: 0. Massachusetts: 0. Jacksonville State: 0. Ball State: 1. Kent State: 0. Western Michigan: 0. Toledo: 0. Buffalo: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. South Alabama: 7 by 29.2. Howard: 3 by 22.5. Minnesota: 2 by 8.3. Massachusetts: 1 by 4.2. Jacksonville State: 4 by 16.7. Ball State: 1 by 14.2. Kent State: 1 by 4.2. Western Michigan: 1 by 4.2. Toledo: 2 by 8.3. Buffalo: 1 by 4.2

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.4 · Games = 5 · +0.4 vs Losses
Losses0 · Games = 5 · -0.4 vs Wins