Usage Score
17.2
Player Dossier
2018-2021Army
WR • 6'3" • 235 lbs • Charlotte, NC, USA
Michael Roberts reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
17.2
Efficiency
43.3
Consistency
75.6
Season Value
37
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2020 Postseason · Army
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Michael Roberts, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2020 Postseason · Army. Michael Roberts reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Michael Roberts played WR for Army. Across 4 tracked seasons, Michael Roberts recorded 151 receiving yards, 4 tackles, and 1 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2020 with Army.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2020 Postseason
Army paired 106 primary output with 86.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2021 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 43.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2021 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Navy
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
2
Receiving Yards / G
6.5
Efficiency
43.3
Usage
17.2
Consistency
75.6
Best Game by takeover score
Navy
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Ball State: 5. Navy: 8
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
2 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Navy
Best efficiency game
53.3 vs Navy
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Army
2018-2021
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Regular Season | Army | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2019 Regular Season | Army | 32 | 71.1 | 21.5 | 32 |
| 2020 Postseason | Army | 106 | 86.7 | 38.3 | 74 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Army | 106 | 86.7 | 38.3 | 0 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Army | 13 | 43.3 | 17.2 | -93 |
#1 Featured game
Massachusetts
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
15
Primary metric
15 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Cincinnati
46
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
46 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Unknown
38
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
38 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Navy
8
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
8 receiving yards with a 53.3 efficiency score.
#5
Western Kentucky
10
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
10 receiving yards with a 66.7 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2020 Postseason · Army
106 primary output · 86.7 efficiency · 38.3 usage
65
#2
2020 Regular Season · Army
65
106 primary · 86.7 efficiency · 38.3 usage
#3
2019 Regular Season · Army
49.6
32 primary · 71.1 efficiency · 21.5 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2017 · Rating 0.7583
Phillip O. Berry Academy · Charlotte, NC
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
151
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 10 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.