Usage Score
23.4
Player Dossier
2018-2022Army
Tyhier Tyler
QB • 5'8" • 183 lbs • Newport News, VA, USA
Balanced quarterback profileVolume operator
Tyhier Tyler is a balanced quarterback profile with 23.4 usage in the latest tracked season.
Efficiency
58.4
Consistency
62.3
Season Value
60.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season · Army
18192020212122
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Army
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Georgia Southern
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Tyhier Tyler, QB. Best season Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season · Army. Tyhier Tyler is a balanced quarterback profile with 23.4 usage in the latest tracked season.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season
Army paired 979 primary output with 58.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Regular Season role shape
pass-led usage with 58.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2022 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Massachusetts
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2022 Regular Season · Army
Games
11
Primary Metric / G
89
Efficiency
58.4
Usage
23.4
Consistency
62.3
Best Game by takeover score
Navy
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Coastal Carolina: 59. UTSA: 138. Unknown: 77. Georgia State: 110. Wake Forest: 107. UL Monroe: 22. Air Force: 14. Troy: 152. UConn: 70. Massachusetts: 168. Navy: 62
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Coastal Carolina: 8 by 35.8. UTSA: 11 by 79.4. Unknown: 12 by 64.2. Georgia State: 20 by 39.5. Wake Forest: 17 by 73.3. UL Monroe: 3 by 73.3. Air Force: 3 by 46.7. Troy: 32 by 65.9. UConn: 19 by 34.7. Massachusetts: 13 by 98. Navy: 25 by 31.7
Split Comparison
Wins80.5 · n=4 · -16.2 vs Losses
Losses96.7 · n=6 · +16.2 vs Wins
First Half85.5 · n=6 · -7.7 vs Second Half
Second Half93.2 · n=5 · +7.7 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Massachusetts
Best efficiency game
98 vs Massachusetts
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/10 | vs NavyDual-threat | W 20-17 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 31.7 | 23 | 62 | 2.70 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 11/26 | @ Massachusetts3+ TD · Dual-threat | W 44-7 | 2 | 2 | 67 | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | 98 | 11 | 101 | 9.20 | 3 | 27 |
| Sat 11/19 | vs UConnDual-threat | W 34-17 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 34.7 | 18 | 70 | 3.90 | 2 | 25 |
| Sat 11/12 | @ TroyDual-threat | L 9-10 | 2 | 5 | 52 | 40.0 | 0 | 0 | 65.9 | 27 | 100 | 3.70 | 1 | 14 |
| Sat 11/5 | vs Air Force | L 7-13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 46.7 | 3 | 14 | 4.70 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 10/22 | vs UL Monroe | W 48-24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 73.3 | 3 | 22 | 7.30 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 10/8 | @ Wake Forest | L 10-45 | 3 | 5 | 67 | 60.0 | 0 | 0 | 73.3 | 12 | 40 | 3.30 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 10/1 | vs Georgia StateDual-threat | L 14-31 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 39.5 | 19 | 110 | 5.80 | 2 | 36 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Unknown3+ TD · Dual-threat | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 64.2 | 12 | 77 | 6.40 | 3 | 23 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs UTSADual-threat | L 38-41 | 1 | 2 | 77 | 50.0 | 1 | 0 | 79.4 | 9 | 61 | 6.80 | 1 | 16 |
| Sat 9/3 | @ Coastal Carolina | L 28-38 | 1 | 3 | 54 | 33.3 | 1 | 1 | 35.8 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Army
2018-2022
Opening stop
Season Progression
2018201920202020202120212022
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Regular Season | Army | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2019 Regular Season | Army | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2020 Postseason | Army | 631 | 55 | 31.9 | 631 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Army | 631 | 55 | 31.9 | 0 |
| 2021 Postseason | Army | 565 | 51.9 | 20.9 | -66 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Army | 565 | 51.9 | 20.9 | 0 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Army | 979 | 58.4 | 23.4 | 414 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Georgia Southern
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
146
Primary metric
146 total offense with 83.6 efficiency.
#2
Navy
124
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
124 total offense with 84.2 efficiency.
#3
Massachusetts
168
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
168 total offense with 98 efficiency.
#4
Troy
152
Primary metric
Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
152 total offense with 65.9 efficiency.
#5
Air Force
78
Primary metric
Win with 78 yards of offense and 81.5 efficiency.
78 total offense with 81.5 efficiency.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2022 Regular Season · Army
979 primary output · 58.4 efficiency · 23.4 usage
60.2
#2
2020 Postseason · Army
55.8
631 primary · 55 efficiency · 31.9 usage
#3
2020 Regular Season · Army
55.8
631 primary · 55 efficiency · 31.9 usage
Milestones
0
250+ passing yards
0
300+ total offense
3
3+ takeover TD games
13
Above avg efficiency
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2017 · Rating 0.7533
Woodside · Newport News, VA
- Committed To
- Army
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2017
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
2,175
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 29 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.