Usage Score
14.7
Player Dossier
2019-2022BYU
Brayden Cosper
WR • 6'3" • 205 lbs • South Jordan, UT, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Brayden Cosper reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
69.4
Consistency
63.2
Season Value
61.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason · BYU
1920212222
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- BYU
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Brayden Cosper, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason · BYU. Brayden Cosper reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason
BYU paired 363 primary output with 69.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 69.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2022 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2022 Postseason · BYU
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
30.3
Efficiency
69.4
Usage
14.7
Consistency
63.2
Best Game by takeover score
SMU
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. SMU: 12. South Florida: 27. Baylor: 13. Oregon: 38. Wyoming: 58. Utah State: 56. Notre Dame: -2. Arkansas: 10. East Carolina: 37. Boise State: 34. Unknown: 66. Stanford: 14
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. SMU: 3 by 26.7. South Florida: 3 by 60. Baylor: 2 by 43.3. Oregon: 3 by 84.4. Wyoming: 4 by 96.7. Utah State: 3 by 100. Notre Dame: 1 by 0. Arkansas: 1 by 66.7. East Carolina: 4 by 61.7. Boise State: 2 by 100. Unknown: 3 by 100. Stanford: 1 by 93.3
Split Comparison
Wins30.6 · n=7 · +9.8 vs Losses
Losses20.8 · n=4 · -9.8 vs Wins
First Half34 · n=6 · +7.5 vs Second Half
Second Half26.5 · n=6 · -7.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Unknown
Best efficiency game
100 vs Unknown
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 12/18 | vs SMU | W 24-23 | — | 3 | 12 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Sun 11/27 | @ Stanford | W 35-26 | — | 1 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 11/19 | vs Unknown | — | — | 3 | 66 | 22 | 22 | 0 | 36 |
| Sat 11/5 | @ Boise State | W 31-28 | — | 2 | 34 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 10/29 | vs East Carolina | L 24-27 | — | 4 | 37 | 9.3 | 9.30 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 10/15 | vs Arkansas | L 35-52 | — | 1 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 10/8 | @ Notre Dame | L 20-28 | — | 1 | -2 | -2 | -2 | 0 | 0 |
| Fri 9/30 | vs Utah State | W 38-26 | — | 3 | 56 | 18.7 | 18.70 | 0 | 40 |
| Sun 9/25 | vs Wyoming | W 38-24 | — | 4 | 58 | 14.5 | 14.50 | 1 | 26 |
| Sat 9/17 | @ Oregon | L 20-41 | — | 3 | 38 | 12.7 | 12.70 | 0 | 17 |
| Sun 9/11 | vs Baylor | W 26-20 | — | 2 | 13 | 6.5 | 6.50 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 9/3 | @ South Florida | W 50-21 | — | 3 | 27 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 14 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
BYU
2019-2022
Opening stop
Season Progression
20192020202120222022
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Regular Season | BYU | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2020 Regular Season | BYU | 36 | 55.5 | 5 | 36 |
| 2021 Regular Season | BYU | 0 | — | — | -36 |
| 2022 Postseason | BYU | 363 | 69.4 | 14.7 | 363 |
| 2022 Regular Season | BYU | 363 | 69.4 | 14.7 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
66
Primary metric
66 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Utah State
56
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
56 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Wyoming
58
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
58 receiving yards with a 96.7 efficiency score.
#4
Troy
22
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
22 receiving yards with a 73.3 efficiency score.
#5
Boise State
34
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
34 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2022 Postseason · BYU
363 primary output · 69.4 efficiency · 14.7 usage
61.8
#2
2022 Regular Season · BYU
61.8
363 primary · 69.4 efficiency · 14.7 usage
#3
2020 Regular Season · BYU
30
36 primary · 55.5 efficiency · 5 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2018 · Rating 0.8204
Bingham · South Jordan, UT
- Committed To
- BYU
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2018
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
399
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 15 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.