Player Stats

Devin Danielson College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
75
TFL
10.5
Sacks
6
QB hurries
4

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2019 Regular SeasonPittsburgh912102-019.9
2020 Regular SeasonPittsburgh92032.51-046.4
2021 PostseasonPittsburgh7311--034.9
2021 Regular SeasonPittsburgh71021--034.9
2022 Regular SeasonPittsburgh914201-020.5
2023 Regular SeasonPittsburgh7161.51.5--023.6

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season

Pittsburgh paired 6.5 primary output with 16.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

2023 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 13.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Cincinnati

Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2023 Regular Season · Pittsburgh

Games

7

Havoc Plays / G

0.4

Efficiency

13.8

Usage

3

Consistency

9.5

Best Game by takeover score

Cincinnati

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Wofford: 0. Cincinnati: 2. North Carolina: 1. Louisville: 0. Wake Forest: 0. Notre Dame: 0. Syracuse: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Wofford: 1 by 4.2. Cincinnati: 3 by 32.5. North Carolina: 2 by 18.3. Louisville: 3 by 12.5. Wake Forest: 3 by 12.5. Notre Dame: 1 by 4.2. Syracuse: 3 by 12.5

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0 · Games = 2 · -0.6 vs Losses
Losses0.6 · Games = 5 · +0.6 vs Wins