Player Dossier

2018-2023

Tulane

Lawrence Keys III

WR • 5'11" • 170 lbs • New Orleans, LA, USA

Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher

Lawrence Keys III reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Usage Score

21.3

Efficiency

87

Consistency

72.5

Season Value

68.9

Career Arc

Value trend by season

Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season · Tulane

1819202021222223

Snapshot

Career Teams
2
Seasons Tracked
8
Program Path
Notre Dame • Tulane
Peak Game
Peak game by takeover score: Ole Miss

Scouting Read

Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.

Lawrence Keys III, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season · Tulane. Lawrence Keys III reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Lawrence Keys III played WR for Notre Dame and Tulane. Across 6 tracked seasons, Lawrence Keys III recorded 113 rushing yards, 1,080 receiving yards, and 1 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2023 with Tulane.

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season

Tulane paired 599 primary output with 87 efficiency.

Supporting note

2023 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 87 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2023 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Notre Dame, Tulane.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Ole Miss

Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 90th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2023 Regular Season · Tulane

Games

10

Receiving Yards / G

59.9

Efficiency

87

Usage

21.3

Consistency

72.5

Best Game by takeover score

Tulsa

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. South Alabama: 96. Ole Miss: 94. Southern Miss: 78. Unknown: 77. UAB: 54. Memphis: 17. North Texas: 78. Rice: 22. East Carolina: 77. Tulsa: 6

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. South Alabama: 4 by 100. Ole Miss: 5 by 100. Southern Miss: 4 by 100. Unknown: 4 by 100. UAB: 3 by 100. Memphis: 2 by 56.7. North Texas: 5 by 100. Rice: 2 by 73.3. East Carolina: 3 by 100. Tulsa: 1 by 40

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins53.5 · Games = 8
First Half79.8 · Games = 5 · +39.8 vs Second Half
Second Half40 · Games = 5 · -39.8 vs First Half
All Games59.9 · Games = 10

Game Log

Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.

10 games

Featured metric

Receiving Yards

Top game by takeover score

Ole Miss

Best efficiency game

100 vs East Carolina

Result
Sat 11/11vs TulsaW 24-22166606
Sat 11/4@ East CarolinaW 13-1037725.725.70150
Sat 10/28@ RiceW 30-282221111018
Sat 10/21vs North TexasW 35-2857815.615.60123
Fri 10/13@ MemphisW 31-212178.58.50111
Sat 9/30vs UABW 35-2335413.218132
Sat 9/23vs Unknown2+ TD47719.319.30240
Sat 9/16@ Southern MissW 21-347819.519.50029
Sat 9/9vs Ole MissL 20-3759415.818.80057
Sun 9/3vs South AlabamaW 37-1749621.624147

Career Arc

Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.

  1. 1

    Notre Dame

    2018-2021

    Opening stop

  2. 2

    Tulane

    2022-2023

    Final stop

Season Progression

20182019202020202021202220222023
SeasonTeamPrimaryEfficiencyUsageDelta
2018 Regular SeasonNotre Dame0
2019 Regular SeasonNotre Dame13467.39.4134
2020 PostseasonNotre Dame51555.8-83
2020 Regular SeasonNotre Dame51555.80
2021 Regular SeasonNotre Dame0-51
2022 PostseasonTulane29661.514.8296
2022 Regular SeasonTulane29661.514.80
2023 Regular SeasonTulane5998721.3303

Signature Performances

Top Games

#1 Featured game

Ole Miss

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

94

Primary metric

94 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#2

South Alabama

96

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

96 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#3

North Texas

78

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

78 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#4

Southern Miss

78

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

78 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#5

UCF

60

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

60 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

Top Seasons

#1 Season by value score

2023 Regular Season · Tulane

599 primary output · 87 efficiency · 21.3 usage

68.9

#2

2022 Postseason · Tulane

44.4

296 primary · 61.5 efficiency · 14.8 usage

#3

2022 Regular Season · Tulane

44.4

296 primary · 61.5 efficiency · 14.8 usage

Milestones

0

100+ receiving yards

0

8+ catch outings

1

2+ TD games

Bio, Recruit, and Data Context

Recruit Profile

4★

Class 2018 · Rating 0.9026

McDonogh 35 · New Orleans, LA

Committed To
Notre Dame
Commit Date
Jan 1, 2018

Career Facts

2

Career teams

8

Seasons tracked

1,080

Career Receiving Yards

Data Context

Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 37 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.