Usage Score
19.3
Player Dossier
2018-2023Pittsburgh
RB • 5'11" • 205 lbs • Williamson, GA, USA
C'Bo Flemister leans balanced backfield option traits and 43.6 efficiency.
Usage Score
19.3
Efficiency
43.6
Consistency
44.8
Season Value
51.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season · Pittsburgh
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
C'Bo Flemister, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season · Pittsburgh. C'Bo Flemister leans balanced backfield option traits and 43.6 efficiency.
C'Bo Flemister played RB for Notre Dame and Pittsburgh. Across 6 tracked seasons, C'Bo Flemister recorded 1,059 rushing yards, 155 receiving yards, and 2 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2023 with Pittsburgh.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season
Pittsburgh paired 473 primary output with 43.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2023 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 43.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2023 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Notre Dame, Pittsburgh.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Virginia Tech
Loss with 98 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 91.7th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Scrimmage Yards / G
39.4
Efficiency
43.6
Usage
19.3
Consistency
44.8
Best Game by takeover score
Duke
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 62. Cincinnati: 38. West Virginia: 34. North Carolina: 10. Virginia Tech: 98. Louisville: 27. Wake Forest: 105. Notre Dame: 20. Florida State: 23. Syracuse: 11. Boston College: 16. Duke: 29
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 11 by 42.2. Cincinnati: 6 by 66. West Virginia: 6 by 59. North Carolina: 2 by 70.8. Virginia Tech: 12 by 59.7. Louisville: 13 by 21.6. Wake Forest: 23 by 47.6. Notre Dame: 9 by 28. Florida State: 5 by 47.9. Syracuse: 4 by 19.8. Boston College: 9 by 18.5. Duke: 6 by 42.6
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Virginia Tech
Best efficiency game
70.8 vs North Carolina
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/25 | @ Duke | L 19-30 | 5 | 18 | 3.60 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 4.8 |
| Fri 11/17 | vs Boston College | W 24-16 | 9 | 16 | 1.80 | 0 | — | — | 1.8 |
| Sat 11/11 | @ Syracuse | L 13-28 | 3 | 4 | 1.30 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 2.8 |
| Sat 11/4 | vs Florida State | L 7-24 | 5 | 23 | 4.60 | 0 | — | — | 4.6 |
| Sat 10/28 | @ Notre Dame | L 7-58 | 8 | 24 | 3 | 0 | 1 | -4 | 2.2 |
| Sat 10/21 | @ Wake Forest100 rush yards | L 17-21 | 23 | 105 | 4.60 | 0 | — | — | 4.6 |
| Sat 10/14 | vs Louisville2+ TD | W 38-21 | 13 | 27 | 2.10 | 2 | — | — | 2.1 |
| Sun 10/1 | @ Virginia Tech | L 21-38 | 10 | 41 | 4.10 | 0 | 2 | 57 | 8.2 |
| Sun 9/24 | vs North Carolina | L 24-41 | 1 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 9/16 | @ West Virginia | L 6-17 | 6 | 34 | 5.70 | 0 | — | — | 5.7 |
| Sat 9/9 | vs Cincinnati | L 21-27 | 6 | 38 | 6.30 | 0 | — | — | 6.3 |
| Sat 9/2 | vs Unknown | — | 9 | 27 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 35 | 5.6 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Notre Dame
2018-2021
Opening stop
Pittsburgh
2022-2023
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 0 | 0 | 0.9 | — |
| 2019 Postseason | Notre Dame | 175 | 37 | 9.7 | 175 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 175 | 37 | 9.7 | 0 |
| 2020 Postseason | Notre Dame | 335 | 37.9 | 10.6 | 160 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 335 | 37.9 | 10.6 | 0 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 10 | 34.7 | 4.8 | -325 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 221 | 43.8 | 7.5 | 211 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 473 | 43.6 | 19.3 | 252 |
#1 Featured game
South Florida
Win with 135 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
135
Primary metric
135 scrimmage yards and 24.1 usage.
#2
Miami
89
Primary metric
Win with 89 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
89 scrimmage yards and 13.2 usage.
#3
Virginia Tech
98
Primary metric
Loss with 98 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
98 scrimmage yards and 34.3 usage.
#4
Wake Forest
105
Primary metric
Loss driven by a workhorse rushing load.
105 scrimmage yards and 38.3 usage.
#5
Virginia
40
Primary metric
Win with 40 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
40 scrimmage yards and 13 usage.
#1 Season by value score
2023 Regular Season · Pittsburgh
473 primary output · 43.6 efficiency · 19.3 usage
51.7
#2
2019 Postseason · Notre Dame
37.6
175 primary · 37 efficiency · 9.7 usage
#3
2019 Regular Season · Notre Dame
37.6
175 primary · 37 efficiency · 9.7 usage
2
100+ rush yards
0
150+ scrimmage yards
2
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2018 · Rating 0.8456
Pike County · Zebulon, GA
Career Facts
2
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
1,214
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 42 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.