Player Stats

Kevin Austin Jr. College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
992
Receptions
53
Touchdowns
7

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2018 Regular SeasonNotre Dame4486045.4
2019 Regular SeasonNotre Dame0-00-
2020 Regular SeasonNotre Dame1118058.1
2021 PostseasonNotre Dame126105180.9
2021 Regular SeasonNotre Dame1242783680.9

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason

Notre Dame paired 888 primary output with 92.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

2021 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 92.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2021 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Navy

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2021 Postseason · Notre Dame

Games

12

Receiving Yards / G

74

Efficiency

92.8

Usage

17.6

Consistency

72.2

Best Game by takeover score

Navy

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Oklahoma State: 105. Florida State: 91. Toledo: 63. Wisconsin: 76. Cincinnati: 17. Virginia Tech: 70. USC: 39. North Carolina: 36. Navy: 139. Virginia: 38. Georgia Tech: 89. Stanford: 125

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oklahoma State: 6 by 100. Florida State: 4 by 100. Toledo: 4 by 100. Wisconsin: 6 by 84.4. Cincinnati: 1 by 100. Virginia Tech: 3 by 100. USC: 4 by 65. North Carolina: 3 by 80. Navy: 6 by 100. Virginia: 3 by 84.4. Georgia Tech: 2 by 100. Stanford: 6 by 100

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins76.6 · Games = 10 · +15.6 vs Losses
Losses61 · Games = 2 · -15.6 vs Wins