Player Stats

Alexander Smith College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
60
TFL
3.5
Sacks
1
Passes defended
10

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2018 Regular SeasonWisconsin11-0-1033.4
2019 Regular SeasonWisconsin34-0-1011.2
2020 PostseasonWisconsin13-0-1037.5
2021 PostseasonWisconsin72-0--014.3
2021 Regular SeasonWisconsin79-0--014.3
2022 Regular SeasonWisconsin51410-2034.3
2023 Regular SeasonWisconsin9272.51-5043.3

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season

Wisconsin paired 8.5 primary output with 22 efficiency.

Supporting note

2023 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 22 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2023 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Iowa

Loss with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 88.9th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2023 Regular Season · Wisconsin

Games

9

Havoc Plays / G

0.9

Efficiency

22

Usage

4.4

Consistency

14.8

Best Game by takeover score

Iowa

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Buffalo: 1. Washington State: 0. Purdue: 4. Rutgers: 0. Iowa: 2.5. Illinois: 0. Ohio State: 0. Indiana: 0. Northwestern: 1

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Buffalo: 3 by 22.5. Washington State: 3 by 12.5. Purdue: 4 by 56.7. Rutgers: 3 by 12.5. Iowa: 4 by 41.7. Illinois: 1 by 4.2. Ohio State: 3 by 12.5. Indiana: 5 by 20.8. Northwestern: 1 by 14.2

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins1.3 · Games = 4 · +0.6 vs Losses
Losses0.7 · Games = 5 · -0.6 vs Wins