Usage Score
10.3
Player Dossier
2018-2023Texas A&M
Max Wright
TE • 6'4" • 260 lbs • Katy, TX, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Max Wright reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
74.6
Consistency
49.3
Season Value
58.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Texas A&M
1818192021222323
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- Texas A&M
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Oklahoma State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Max Wright, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Texas A&M. Max Wright reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason
Texas A&M paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2023 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 74.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Oklahoma State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2023 Postseason · Texas A&M
Games
9
Receiving Yards / G
27.4
Efficiency
74.6
Usage
10.3
Consistency
49.3
Best Game by takeover score
Oklahoma State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Oklahoma State: 62. Miami: 18. UL Monroe: 28. Arkansas: 20. Tennessee: 26. South Carolina: 9. Ole Miss: 7. Mississippi State: 17. LSU: 60
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oklahoma State: 4 by 100. Miami: 1 by 100. UL Monroe: 2 by 93.3. Arkansas: 2 by 66.7. Tennessee: 3 by 57.8. South Carolina: 2 by 30. Ole Miss: 2 by 23.3. Mississippi State: 1 by 100. LSU: 2 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins18.5 · n=4 · -16.1 vs Losses
Losses34.6 · n=5 · +16.1 vs Wins
First Half30.8 · n=5 · +7.6 vs Second Half
Second Half23.3 · n=4 · -7.6 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Oklahoma State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Oklahoma State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 12/28 | @ Oklahoma State | L 23-31 | — | 4 | 62 | 15.5 | 15.50 | 0 | 40 |
| Sat 11/25 | @ LSU | L 30-42 | — | 2 | 60 | 30 | 30 | 1 | 51 |
| Sun 11/12 | vs Mississippi State | W 51-10 | — | 1 | 17 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 11/4 | @ Ole Miss | L 35-38 | — | 2 | 7 | 3.5 | 3.50 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 10/28 | vs South Carolina | W 30-17 | — | 2 | 9 | 4.5 | 4.50 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 10/14 | @ Tennessee | L 13-20 | — | 3 | 26 | 8.7 | 8.70 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 9/30 | @ Arkansas | W 34-22 | — | 2 | 20 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 9/16 | vs UL Monroe | W 47-3 | — | 2 | 28 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 9/9 | @ Miami | L 33-48 | — | 1 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 18 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Texas A&M
2018-2023
Opening stop
Season Progression
20182018201920202021202220232023
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Postseason | Texas A&M | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2018 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 42 | 100 | 5.9 | 42 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 23 | 51.1 | 5.6 | -19 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 129 | 87.2 | 10.1 | 106 |
| 2023 Postseason | Texas A&M | 247 | 74.6 | 10.3 | 118 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 247 | 74.6 | 10.3 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Oklahoma State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
62
Primary metric
62 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
South Carolina
42
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
42 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
LSU
60
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
60 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Florida
59
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
59 receiving yards with a 78.7 efficiency score.
#5
Missouri
8
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
8 receiving yards with a 53.3 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2018 Postseason · Texas A&M
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2018 Regular Season · Texas A&M
100
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2019 Regular Season · Texas A&M
100
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2018 · Rating 0.9245
Taylor · Katy, TX
- Committed To
- Texas A&M
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2018
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
441
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 20 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.