Player Stats

Deneric Prince College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
1,906
Rushing yards
1,744
Receiving yards
162
Touchdowns
15

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2018 Regular SeasonTexas A&M121210050.8
2020 PostseasonTulsa841410158.2
2020 Regular SeasonTulsa844042911358.2
2021 PostseasonTulsa1044440056.8
2021 Regular SeasonTulsa1054748067556.8
2022 Regular SeasonTulsa881372984668.3

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season

Tulsa paired 813 primary output with 47.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

2022 Regular Season role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 47.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2022 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Texas A&M, Tulsa.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Temple

Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2022 Regular Season · Tulsa

Games

8

Scrimmage Yards / G

101.6

Efficiency

47.6

Usage

30.5

Consistency

38.4

Best Game by takeover score

Temple

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Cincinnati: 71. Navy: -5. Temple: 260. SMU: 100. Tulane: 64. Memphis: 32. South Florida: 239. Houston: 52

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Cincinnati: 18 by 41.1. Navy: 4 by 0. Temple: 22 by 99.2. SMU: 20 by 49.1. Tulane: 15 by 42.3. Memphis: 10 by 34.9. South Florida: 27 by 86.9. Houston: 19 by 27

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins183.7 · Games = 3 · +131.3 vs Losses
Losses52.4 · Games = 5 · -131.3 vs Wins