Usage Score
13
Player Dossier
2018-2022Texas A&M
Jeremiah Martin
DL • 6'4" • 261 lbs • San Bernardino, CA, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Jeremiah Martin shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 30.3 disruption score.
Efficiency
30.3
Consistency
39.6
Season Value
33.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · Texas A&M
181919202122
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Texas A&M • Washington
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Arizona
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jeremiah Martin, DL. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · Texas A&M. Jeremiah Martin shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 30.3 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season
Texas A&M paired 0 primary output with 4.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 30.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2022 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Texas A&M, Washington.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Arizona
Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2022 Regular Season · Washington
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
1.7
Efficiency
30.3
Usage
13
Consistency
39.6
Best Game by takeover score
Washington State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Kent State: 0.5. Unknown: 1. Michigan State: 0. Stanford: 3. UCLA: 2. Arizona State: 0. Arizona: 4. California: 3. Oregon State: 1. Oregon: 1. Colorado: 1. Washington State: 4
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Kent State: 3 by 17.5. Unknown: 2 by 18.3. Michigan State: 5 by 20.8. Stanford: 2 by 38.3. UCLA: 2 by 28.3. Arizona State: 3 by 12.5. Arizona: 9 by 77.5. California: 2 by 38.3. Oregon State: 3 by 22.5. Oregon: 3 by 22.5. Colorado: 1 by 14.2. Washington State: 3 by 52.5
Split Comparison
Wins1.9 · n=9 · +0.9 vs Losses
Losses1 · n=2 · -0.9 vs Wins
First Half1.1 · n=6 · -1.3 vs Second Half
Second Half2.3 · n=6 · +1.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Arizona
Best efficiency game
77.5 vs Arizona
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 11/27 | @ Washington State2+ sacks · Splash game | W 51-33 | 3 | 2 | — | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/20 | vs Colorado | W 54-7 | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/13 | @ Oregon | W 37-34 | 3 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/5 | vs Oregon State | W 24-21 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sun 10/23 | @ CaliforniaSplash game | W 28-21 | 2 | 2 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/15 | vs Arizona2+ sacks · Splash game | W 49-39 | 9 | 7 | — | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/8 | @ Arizona State | L 38-45 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/1 | @ UCLA | L 32-40 | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/25 | vs Stanford | W 40-22 | 2 | 1 | — | 1.50 | 1.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Michigan State | W 39-28 | 5 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Unknown | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/4 | vs Kent State | W 45-20 | 3 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Texas A&M
2018-2020
Opening stop
- 2
Washington
2021-2022
Final stop
Season Progression
201820192019202020212022
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 0 | 4.2 | 1.3 | — |
| 2019 Postseason | Texas A&M | 3 | 10.6 | 4.1 | 3 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 3 | 10.6 | 4.1 | 0 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 0 | 4.2 | 0.8 | -3 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Washington | 2 | 8.3 | 3.9 | 2 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Washington | 20.5 | 30.3 | 13 | 18.5 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Arizona
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
4
Primary metric
4 disruption/tackle impact with 69.5 takeover score.
#2
Washington State
4
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 55.4 takeover score.
#3
Colorado
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 50.1 takeover score.
#4
California
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 41.9 takeover score.
#5
Auburn
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 41.8 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2018 Regular Season · Texas A&M
0 primary output · 4.2 efficiency · 1.3 usage
35.2
#2
2020 Regular Season · Texas A&M
35
0 primary · 4.2 efficiency · 0.8 usage
#3
2022 Regular Season · Washington
33.9
20.5 primary · 30.3 efficiency · 13 usage
Milestones
1
Impact games
3
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2018 · Rating 0.9083
Cajon · San Bernardino, CA
- Committed To
- Texas A&M
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2018
Career Facts
2
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
62
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 30 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.