Player Stats

Jack Sullivan College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
90
TFL
16
Sacks
10.5
QB hurries
4
Passes defended
7

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2018 Regular SeasonPurdue11-0--037.5
2019 Regular SeasonPurdue913-0-5016.5
2020 Regular SeasonPurdue41221--027.9
2021 PostseasonPurdue1141.51--052.7
2021 Regular SeasonPurdue11193.5231052.7
2022 PostseasonPurdue130-0--059
2022 Regular SeasonPurdue133375.511059
2023 PostseasonUSC43-0--035.7
2023 Regular SeasonUSC4521--035.7

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason

Purdue paired 14.5 primary output with 21.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

2023 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 15.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Purdue, USC.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: UCLA

Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2023 Postseason · USC

Games

4

Havoc Plays / G

0.8

Efficiency

15.8

Usage

8.1

Consistency

38.9

Best Game by takeover score

UCLA

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Louisville: 0. Arizona: 0. Oregon: 1. UCLA: 2

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Louisville: 3 by 12.5. Arizona: 1 by 4.2. Oregon: 2 by 18.3. UCLA: 2 by 28.3

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0 · Games = 2 · -1.5 vs Losses
Losses1.5 · Games = 2 · +1.5 vs Wins