Usage Score
34.3
Player Dossier
2018-2020Purdue
WR • 5'9" • 180 lbs • New Albany, IN, USA
Rondale Moore reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
34.3
Efficiency
69.5
Consistency
75.7
Season Value
67.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Purdue
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Rondale Moore, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Purdue. Rondale Moore reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason
Purdue paired 1,258 primary output with 69.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 69.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2020 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Ohio State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
96.8
Efficiency
69.5
Usage
34.3
Consistency
75.7
Best Game by takeover score
Auburn
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Auburn: 94. Northwestern: 109. Eastern Michigan: 16. Missouri: 137. Boston College: 110. Nebraska: 85. Illinois: 101. Ohio State: 170. Michigan State: 74. Iowa: 31. Minnesota: 76. Wisconsin: 114. Indiana: 141
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Auburn: 11 by 57. Northwestern: 11 by 66.1. Eastern Michigan: 3 by 35.6. Missouri: 11 by 83. Boston College: 8 by 91.7. Nebraska: 8 by 70.8. Illinois: 4 by 100. Ohio State: 12 by 94.4. Michigan State: 11 by 44.8. Iowa: 6 by 34.4. Minnesota: 8 by 63.3. Wisconsin: 9 by 84.4. Indiana: 12 by 78.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Ohio State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Illinois
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/28 | @ AuburnHigh volume | L 14-63 | — | 11 | 94 | 7.4 | 8.50 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 11/24 | @ Indiana100 receiving yards · High volume | W 28-21 | — | 12 | 141 | 10.3 | 11.80 | 2 | 56 |
| Sat 11/17 | vs Wisconsin100 receiving yards · High volume | L 44-47 | — | 9 | 114 | 10.8 | 12.70 | 2 | 46 |
| Sat 11/10 | @ MinnesotaHigh volume | L 10-41 | — | 8 | 76 | 9.5 | 9.50 | 1 | 15 |
| Sat 11/3 | vs Iowa | W 38-36 | — | 6 | 31 | 5.2 | 5.20 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 10/27 | @ Michigan StateHigh volume | L 13-23 | — | 11 | 74 | 6.7 | 6.70 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 10/20 | vs Ohio State100 receiving yards · High volume | W 49-20 | — | 12 | 170 | 13.9 | 14.20 | 2 | 43 |
| Sat 10/13 | @ Illinois100 receiving yards | W 46-7 | — | 4 | 101 | 17.3 | 25.30 | 1 | 60 |
| Sat 9/29 | @ NebraskaHigh volume | W 42-28 | — | 8 | 85 | 9.9 | 10.60 | 0 | 40 |
| Sat 9/22 | vs Boston College100 receiving yards · High volume | W 30-13 | — | 8 | 110 | 11.4 | 13.80 | 2 | 70 |
| Sat 9/15 | vs Missouri100 receiving yards · High volume | L 37-40 | — | 11 | 137 | 12.5 | 12.50 | 1 | 42 |
| Sat 9/8 | vs Eastern Michigan | L 19-20 | — | 3 | 16 | 13 | 5.30 | 0 | 9 |
| Fri 8/31 | vs Northwestern100 receiving yards · High volume | L 27-31 | — | 11 | 109 | 14.5 | 9.90 | 1 | 32 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Purdue
2018-2020
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Postseason | Purdue | 1,258 | 69.5 | 34.3 | — |
| 2018 Regular Season | Purdue | 1,258 | 69.5 | 34.3 | 0 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Purdue | 387 | 72.7 | 25.3 | -871 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Purdue | 270 | 54.7 | 39.1 | -117 |
#1 Featured game
Ohio State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
170
Primary metric
170 receiving yards with a 94.4 efficiency score.
#2
Vanderbilt
220
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
220 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Indiana
141
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
141 receiving yards with a 78.3 efficiency score.
#4
Boston College
110
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
110 receiving yards with a 91.7 efficiency score.
#5
Minnesota
116
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
116 receiving yards with a 51.6 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2018 Postseason · Purdue
1,258 primary output · 69.5 efficiency · 34.3 usage
67.6
#2
2018 Regular Season · Purdue
67.6
1,258 primary · 69.5 efficiency · 34.3 usage
#3
2020 Regular Season · Purdue
50.5
270 primary · 54.7 efficiency · 39.1 usage
10
100+ receiving yards
14
8+ catch outings
4
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2018 · Rating 0.9123
Trinity · Louisville, KY
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
1,915
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 20 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Rondale Moore quick answers
Recruiting profile
4-star recruit