Player Stats

Grant Sawyer College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
115
TFL
18.5
Sacks
4
QB hurries
5
Passes defended
3

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2018 Regular SeasonTulsa611201-032.5
2019 Regular SeasonTulsa57-01-012.9
2020 PostseasonTulsa62-0-1062.8
2020 Regular SeasonTulsa621721-062.8
2021 Regular SeasonTulsa11293111039
2022 Regular SeasonTulsa11456.5111059.2

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2020 Postseason

Tulsa paired 11 primary output with 34.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

2022 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 25.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2022 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Temple

Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2022 Regular Season · Tulsa

Games

11

Havoc Plays / G

0.9

Efficiency

25.7

Usage

8.4

Consistency

55.1

Best Game by takeover score

Temple

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Wyoming: 1. Northern Illinois: 1.5. Jacksonville State: 2. Ole Miss: 1.5. Cincinnati: 0. Temple: 2. SMU: 1. Tulane: 0. Memphis: 0. South Florida: 0. Houston: 0.5

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Wyoming: 2 by 18.3. Northern Illinois: 8 by 48.3. Jacksonville State: 4 by 36.7. Ole Miss: 3 by 27.5. Cincinnati: 3 by 12.5. Temple: 4 by 36.7. SMU: 6 by 35. Tulane: 6 by 25. Memphis: 3 by 12.5. South Florida: 2 by 8.3. Houston: 4 by 21.7

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins1.2 · Games = 5 · +0.6 vs Losses
Losses0.6 · Games = 6 · -0.6 vs Wins