Usage Score
18.2
Player Dossier
2018-2021Michigan
Aidan Hutchinson
DL • 6'6" • 269 lbs • Plymouth, MI, USA
High-volume tacklerDown-to-down presence
Aidan Hutchinson shows a high-volume tackler profile with 41 disruption score.
Efficiency
41
Consistency
58.4
Season Value
42.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason · Michigan
181919202121
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Michigan
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Ohio State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Aidan Hutchinson, DL. Best season Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason · Michigan. Aidan Hutchinson shows a high-volume tackler profile with 41 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason
Michigan paired 33.5 primary output with 41 efficiency.
Supporting note
2021 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 41 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2021 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Ohio State
Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2021 Postseason · Michigan
Games
14
Havoc Plays / G
2.4
Efficiency
41
Usage
18.2
Consistency
58.4
Best Game by takeover score
Georgia
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011121314
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Georgia: 1. Western Michigan: 2. Washington: 5. Northern Illinois: 2. Rutgers: 2. Wisconsin: 0.5. Nebraska: 0. Northwestern: 2. Michigan State: 3. Indiana: 0. Penn State: 6. Maryland: 2. Ohio State: 6. Iowa: 2
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Georgia: 4 by 26.7. Western Michigan: 4 by 36.7. Washington: 4 by 66.7. Northern Illinois: 2 by 28.3. Rutgers: 5 by 40.8. Wisconsin: 3 by 17.5. Nebraska: 6 by 25. Northwestern: 3 by 32.5. Michigan State: 3 by 42.5. Indiana: 5 by 20.8. Penn State: 7 by 79.2. Maryland: 5 by 40.8. Ohio State: 7 by 79.2. Iowa: 4 by 36.7
Split Comparison
Wins2.5 · n=12 · +0.5 vs Losses
Losses2 · n=2 · -0.5 vs Wins
First Half1.8 · n=7 · -1.2 vs Second Half
Second Half3 · n=7 · +1.2 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Ohio State
Best efficiency game
79.2 vs Ohio State
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 1/1 | vs Georgia | L 11-34 | 4 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 12/5 | @ Iowa | W 42-3 | 4 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/27 | vs Ohio State2+ sacks · Splash game | W 42-27 | 7 | 5 | — | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/20 | @ Maryland | W 59-18 | 5 | 5 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/13 | @ Penn State2+ sacks · Splash game | W 21-17 | 7 | 2 | — | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/6 | vs Indiana | W 29-7 | 5 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/30 | @ Michigan State | L 33-37 | 3 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/23 | vs Northwestern | W 33-7 | 3 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/9 | @ Nebraska | W 32-29 | 6 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/2 | @ Wisconsin | W 38-17 | 3 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/25 | vs Rutgers | W 20-13 | 5 | 3 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/18 | vs Northern Illinois | W 63-10 | 2 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/12 | vs Washington2+ sacks · Splash game | W 31-10 | 4 | 3 | — | 2.50 | 2.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/4 | vs Western Michigan | W 47-14 | 4 | 4 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Michigan
2018-2021
Opening stop
Season Progression
201820192019202020212021
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Regular Season | Michigan | 1 | 8.6 | 1.8 | — |
| 2019 Postseason | Michigan | 20.5 | 37.6 | 11.1 | 19.5 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Michigan | 20.5 | 37.6 | 11.1 | 0 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Michigan | 1 | 35 | 4.8 | -19.5 |
| 2021 Postseason | Michigan | 33.5 | 41 | 18.2 | 32.5 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Michigan | 33.5 | 41 | 18.2 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Ohio State
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
6
Primary metric
6 disruption/tackle impact with 69.7 takeover score.
#2
Penn State
6
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
6 disruption/tackle impact with 66.5 takeover score.
#3
Iowa
4.5
Primary metric
Win with 4.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4.5 disruption/tackle impact with 60.8 takeover score.
#4
Washington
5
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
5 disruption/tackle impact with 58.6 takeover score.
#5
Indiana
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 48.7 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2021 Postseason · Michigan
33.5 primary output · 41 efficiency · 18.2 usage
42.5
#2
2021 Regular Season · Michigan
42.5
33.5 primary · 41 efficiency · 18.2 usage
#3
2020 Regular Season · Michigan
35.3
1 primary · 35 efficiency · 4.8 usage
Milestones
3
Impact games
4
Splash games
2
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2018 · Rating 0.9498
Divine Child · Dearborn, MI
- Committed To
- Michigan
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2018
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
148
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 35 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.