Usage Score
35.1
Player Dossier
2018-2021Michigan
Hassan Haskins
RB • 6'1" • 220 lbs • Eureka, MO, USA
Workhorse runnerSteady chain mover
Hassan Haskins leans workhorse runner traits and 50.4 efficiency.
Efficiency
50.4
Consistency
55.7
Season Value
60.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason · Michigan
181919202121
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Michigan
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Penn State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Hassan Haskins, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason · Michigan. Hassan Haskins leans workhorse runner traits and 50.4 efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason
Michigan paired 1,458 primary output with 50.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2021 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 50.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2021 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Penn State
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2021 Postseason · Michigan
Games
14
Scrimmage Yards / G
104.1
Efficiency
50.4
Usage
35.1
Consistency
55.7
Best Game by takeover score
Georgia
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011121314
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Georgia: 54. Western Michigan: 70. Washington: 155. Northern Illinois: 56. Rutgers: 41. Wisconsin: 53. Nebraska: 123. Northwestern: 110. Michigan State: 77. Indiana: 188. Penn State: 201. Maryland: 78. Ohio State: 174. Iowa: 78
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Georgia: 11 by 47.5. Western Michigan: 14 by 54.5. Washington: 28 by 58.9. Northern Illinois: 9 by 64.8. Rutgers: 12 by 35.6. Wisconsin: 20 by 26.5. Nebraska: 21 by 61. Northwestern: 23 by 49.8. Michigan State: 16 by 46.4. Indiana: 28 by 66.9. Penn State: 36 by 54.7. Maryland: 20 by 40.6. Ohio State: 30 by 61.9. Iowa: 20 by 36.8
Split Comparison
Wins110.6 · n=12 · +45.1 vs Losses
Losses65.5 · n=2 · -45.1 vs Wins
First Half78.9 · n=7 · -50.6 vs Second Half
Second Half129.4 · n=7 · +50.6 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Penn State
Best efficiency game
66.9 vs Indiana
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 1/1 | vs Georgia | L 11-34 | 9 | 39 | 4.30 | 0 | 2 | 15 | 4.9 |
| Sun 12/5 | @ Iowa2+ TD | W 42-3 | 17 | 56 | 3.30 | 2 | 3 | 22 | 3.9 |
| Sat 11/27 | vs Ohio State100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 42-27 | 28 | 169 | 6 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 5.8 |
| Sat 11/20 | @ Maryland2+ TD | W 59-18 | 20 | 78 | 3.90 | 2 | — | — | 3.9 |
| Sat 11/13 | @ Penn State100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 21-17 | 31 | 156 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 45 | 5.6 |
| Sat 11/6 | vs Indiana100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 29-7 | 27 | 168 | 6.20 | 1 | 1 | 20 | 6.7 |
| Sat 10/30 | @ Michigan State | L 33-37 | 14 | 59 | 4.20 | 0 | 2 | 18 | 4.8 |
| Sat 10/23 | vs Northwestern100 rush yards · 2+ TD | W 33-7 | 23 | 110 | 4.80 | 2 | — | — | 4.8 |
| Sat 10/9 | @ Nebraska100 rush yards · 2+ TD | W 32-29 | 21 | 123 | 5.90 | 2 | — | — | 5.9 |
| Sat 10/2 | @ Wisconsin | W 38-17 | 19 | 47 | 2.50 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 2.6 |
| Sat 9/25 | vs Rutgers2+ TD | W 20-13 | 12 | 41 | 3.40 | 2 | — | — | 3.4 |
| Sat 9/18 | vs Northern Illinois2+ TD | W 63-10 | 9 | 56 | 6.20 | 2 | — | — | 6.2 |
| Sun 9/12 | vs Washington100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 31-10 | 27 | 155 | 5.70 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5.5 |
| Sat 9/4 | vs Western Michigan | W 47-14 | 13 | 70 | 5.40 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Michigan
2018-2021
Opening stop
Season Progression
201820192019202020212021
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Regular Season | Michigan | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2019 Postseason | Michigan | 662 | 46.1 | 19 | 662 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Michigan | 662 | 46.1 | 19 | 0 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Michigan | 376 | 63.5 | 19.7 | -286 |
| 2021 Postseason | Michigan | 1,458 | 50.4 | 35.1 | 1,082 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Michigan | 1,458 | 50.4 | 35.1 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Penn State
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
201
Primary metric
201 scrimmage yards and 60 usage.
#2
Indiana
188
Primary metric
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
188 scrimmage yards and 52.8 usage.
#3
Notre Dame
149
Primary metric
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
149 scrimmage yards and 30.8 usage.
#4
Ohio State
174
Primary metric
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
174 scrimmage yards and 54.5 usage.
#5
Illinois
125
Primary metric
Win with 125 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
125 scrimmage yards and 20.3 usage.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2021 Postseason · Michigan
1,458 primary output · 50.4 efficiency · 35.1 usage
60.3
#2
2021 Regular Season · Michigan
60.3
1,458 primary · 50.4 efficiency · 35.1 usage
#3
2020 Regular Season · Michigan
44.3
376 primary · 63.5 efficiency · 19.7 usage
Milestones
10
100+ rush yards
4
150+ scrimmage yards
9
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2018 · Rating 0.8539
Eureka · Eureka, MO
- Committed To
- Michigan
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2018
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
2,496
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 32 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.