Player Stats

Dontay Demus Jr. College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
2,008
Receptions
128
Touchdowns
14

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2018 Regular SeasonMaryland713278056.3
2019 Regular SeasonMaryland1241625676.1
2020 Regular SeasonMaryland524365476
2021 Regular SeasonMaryland528507379.9
2022 Regular SeasonMaryland1122233143.9

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season

Maryland paired 507 primary output with 92.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

2022 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 64.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2022 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Ohio State

Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2022 Regular Season · Maryland

Games

11

Receiving Yards / G

21.2

Efficiency

64.8

Usage

8.4

Consistency

45.7

Best Game by takeover score

Ohio State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Buffalo: 23. Charlotte: 29. SMU: 5. Michigan: 12. Michigan State: 16. Purdue: 40. Indiana: 17. Northwestern: 4. Wisconsin: 7. Ohio State: 67. Rutgers: 13

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Buffalo: 3 by 51.1. Charlotte: 2 by 96.7. SMU: 1 by 33.3. Michigan: 2 by 40. Michigan State: 1 by 100. Purdue: 2 by 100. Indiana: 1 by 100. Northwestern: 1 by 26.7. Wisconsin: 1 by 46.7. Ohio State: 5 by 89.3. Rutgers: 3 by 28.9

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins15.3 · Games = 7 · -16.2 vs Losses
Losses31.5 · Games = 4 · +16.2 vs Wins