Usage Score
14.2
Player Dossier
2018-2022Alabama
TE • 6'5" • 244 lbs • Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Cameron Latu reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
14.2
Efficiency
80.3
Consistency
58.6
Season Value
63.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · Alabama
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Cameron Latu, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · Alabama. Cameron Latu reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season
Alabama paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 80.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2022 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Tennessee
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
10
Receiving Yards / G
37.7
Efficiency
80.3
Usage
14.2
Consistency
58.6
Best Game by takeover score
Kansas State
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Kansas State: 54. Texas: 28. UL Monroe: 51. Vanderbilt: 27. Texas A&M: 10. Tennessee: 90. Mississippi State: 11. LSU: 50. Ole Miss: 38. Auburn: 18
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Kansas State: 5 by 72. Texas: 4 by 46.7. UL Monroe: 3 by 100. Vanderbilt: 3 by 60. Texas A&M: 1 by 66.7. Tennessee: 6 by 100. Mississippi State: 1 by 73.3. LSU: 3 by 100. Ole Miss: 3 by 84.4. Auburn: 1 by 100
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Tennessee
Best efficiency game
100 vs Auburn
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/31 | @ Kansas State | W 45-20 | — | 5 | 54 | 10.8 | 10.80 | 1 | 23 |
| Sat 11/26 | vs Auburn | W 49-27 | — | 1 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 11/12 | @ Ole Miss | W 30-24 | — | 3 | 38 | 12.7 | 12.70 | 1 | 15 |
| Sat 11/5 | @ LSU | L 31-32 | — | 3 | 50 | 16.7 | 16.70 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Mississippi State | W 30-6 | — | 1 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/15 | @ Tennessee | L 49-52 | — | 6 | 90 | 15 | 15 | 1 | 27 |
| Sun 10/9 | vs Texas A&M | W 24-20 | — | 1 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 1 | 10 |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Vanderbilt | W 55-3 | — | 3 | 27 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs UL Monroe | W 63-7 | — | 3 | 51 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 38 |
| Sat 9/10 | @ Texas | W 20-19 | — | 4 | 28 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 14 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Alabama
2018-2022
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Regular Season | Alabama | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2019 Regular Season | Alabama | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Alabama | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2021 Postseason | Alabama | 410 | 82 | 7.4 | 410 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Alabama | 410 | 82 | 7.4 | 0 |
| 2022 Postseason | Alabama | 377 | 80.3 | 14.2 | -33 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Alabama | 377 | 80.3 | 14.2 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Tennessee
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
90
Primary metric
90 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Georgia
102
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
102 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
UL Monroe
51
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
51 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Southern Miss
57
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
57 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
LSU
50
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
50 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2018 Regular Season · Alabama
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2019 Regular Season · Alabama
100
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2022 Postseason · Alabama
63.3
377 primary · 80.3 efficiency · 14.2 usage
1
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2018 · Rating 0.945
Olympus · Salt Lake City, UT
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
787
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 28 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Cameron Latu quick answers
Recruiting profile
4-star recruit