Usage Score
36.4
Player Dossier
2018-2021Cincinnati
RB • 5'11" • 215 lbs • Seffner, FL, USA
Jerome Ford leans workhorse runner traits and 63 efficiency.
Usage Score
36.4
Efficiency
63
Consistency
70.8
Season Value
67.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason · Cincinnati
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jerome Ford, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason · Cincinnati. Jerome Ford leans workhorse runner traits and 63 efficiency.
Jerome Ford played RB for Alabama and Cincinnati. Across 4 tracked seasons, Jerome Ford recorded 1,953 rushing yards, 282 receiving yards, and 5 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2021 with Cincinnati.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason
Cincinnati paired 1,539 primary output with 63 efficiency.
Supporting note
2021 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 63 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2021 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Alabama, Cincinnati.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Houston
Win with 204 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 92.3th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Scrimmage Yards / G
118.4
Efficiency
63
Usage
36.4
Consistency
70.8
Best Game by takeover score
Alabama
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Alabama: 88. Miami (OH): 140. Unknown: 113. Indiana: 67. Notre Dame: 72. Temple: 154. UCF: 212. Navy: 101. Tulane: 107. Tulsa: 91. SMU: 105. East Carolina: 85. Houston: 204
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Alabama: 18 by 52.5. Miami (OH): 14 by 91.7. Unknown: 18 by 65.4. Indiana: 21 by 33.9. Notre Dame: 18 by 42.8. Temple: 17 by 87.7. UCF: 21 by 92.1. Navy: 17 by 62.3. Tulane: 22 by 42.8. Tulsa: 9 by 63.6. SMU: 22 by 45.5. East Carolina: 20 by 44.3. Houston: 19 by 94.7
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Houston
Best efficiency game
94.7 vs Houston
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/31 | @ Alabama | L 6-27 | 15 | 77 | 5.10 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 4.9 |
| Sat 12/4 | vs Houston100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 35-20 | 18 | 187 | 10.40 | 2 | 1 | 17 | 10.7 |
| Fri 11/26 | @ East Carolina | W 35-13 | 20 | 85 | 4.30 | 1 | — | — | 4.3 |
| Sat 11/20 | vs SMU | W 48-14 | 20 | 82 | 4.10 | 1 | 2 | 23 | 4.8 |
| Sat 11/6 | vs Tulsa | W 28-20 | 7 | 24 | 3.40 | 1 | 2 | 67 | 10.1 |
| Sat 10/30 | @ Tulane2+ TD | W 31-12 | 18 | 65 | 3.60 | 1 | 4 | 42 | 4.9 |
| Sat 10/23 | @ Navy | W 27-20 | 15 | 90 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 5.9 |
| Sat 10/16 | vs UCF100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 56-21 | 20 | 189 | 9.50 | 4 | 1 | 23 | 10.1 |
| Fri 10/8 | vs Temple100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 52-3 | 15 | 149 | 9.90 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 9.1 |
| Sat 10/2 | @ Notre Dame | W 24-13 | 17 | 71 | 4.20 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Sat 9/18 | @ Indiana2+ TD | W 38-24 | 20 | 66 | 3.30 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3.2 |
| Sat 9/11 | vs Unknown100 rush yards · 2+ TD | — | 18 | 113 | 6.30 | 3 | — | — | 6.3 |
| Sat 9/4 | vs Miami (OH)100 rush yards | W 49-14 | 12 | 121 | 10.10 | 1 | 2 | 19 | 10 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Alabama
2018-2019
Opening stop
Cincinnati
2020-2021
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Regular Season | Alabama | 37 | 38.9 | 2.9 | — |
| 2019 Regular Season | Alabama | 125 | 48.9 | 10.6 | 88 |
| 2020 Postseason | Cincinnati | 534 | 59.7 | 14.2 | 409 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 534 | 59.7 | 14.2 | 0 |
| 2021 Postseason | Cincinnati | 1,539 | 63 | 36.4 | 1,005 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 1,539 | 63 | 36.4 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Houston
Win with 204 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
204
Primary metric
204 scrimmage yards and 48.7 usage.
#2
UCF
212
Primary metric
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
212 scrimmage yards and 38.2 usage.
#3
Memphis
116
Primary metric
Win with 116 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
116 scrimmage yards and 14.5 usage.
#4
Georgia
112
Primary metric
Loss with 112 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
112 scrimmage yards and 20 usage.
#5
Louisiana
33
Primary metric
Win with 33 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
33 scrimmage yards and 5.1 usage.
#1 Season by value score
2021 Postseason · Cincinnati
1,539 primary output · 63 efficiency · 36.4 usage
67.6
#2
2021 Regular Season · Cincinnati
67.6
1,539 primary · 63 efficiency · 36.4 usage
#3
2020 Postseason · Cincinnati
40.7
534 primary · 59.7 efficiency · 14.2 usage
10
100+ rush yards
3
150+ scrimmage yards
8
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2018 · Rating 0.8909
Armwood · TAMPA, FL
Career Facts
2
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
2,235
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 31 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.