Player Stats

Patrick Surtain II College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
114
TFL
6
QB hurries
4
Passes defended
26
Touchdowns
2

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2018 PostseasonAlabama154-0-1028.7
2018 Regular SeasonAlabama15331.5016028.7
2019 PostseasonAlabama127-0-1045.5
2019 Regular SeasonAlabama12351017045.5
2020 PostseasonAlabama1261.50-2054.6
2020 Regular SeasonAlabama12292029254.6

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2020 Postseason

Alabama paired 17.5 primary output with 26.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

2020 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 26.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2020 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Tennessee

Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2020 Postseason · Alabama

Games

12

Havoc Plays / G

1.5

Efficiency

26.7

Usage

5.2

Consistency

48.5

Best Game by takeover score

Tennessee

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Ohio State: 2. Notre Dame: 1.5. Missouri: 0. Texas A&M: 2. Ole Miss: 1. Georgia: 1. Tennessee: 4. Mississippi State: 1. Kentucky: 1. Auburn: 1. LSU: 1. Florida: 2

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Ohio State: 3 by 32.5. Notre Dame: 3 by 27.5. Missouri: 1 by 4.2. Texas A&M: 1 by 24.2. Ole Miss: 6 by 35. Georgia: 5 by 30.8. Tennessee: 4 by 56.7. Mississippi State: 4 by 26.7. Kentucky: 2 by 18.3. Auburn: 3 by 22.5. LSU: 0 by 10. Florida: 3 by 32.5

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

First Half1.3 · Games = 6 · -0.4 vs Second Half
Second Half1.7 · Games = 6 · +0.4 vs First Half