Player Stats

Jaylon Allen College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
150
TFL
26.5
Sacks
13
QB hurries
12
Passes defended
4
Touchdowns
3

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2019 Regular SeasonMemphis34-0--038.5
2020 PostseasonMemphis4611--028.4
2020 Regular SeasonMemphis4510--128.4
2021 Regular SeasonMemphis11377.5531051.6
2022 PostseasonMemphis13111--067
2022 Regular SeasonMemphis13569461267
2023 PostseasonMemphis132-0--049.8
2023 Regular SeasonMemphis13397232049.8

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason

Memphis paired 23 primary output with 33.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

2023 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 23.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: North Texas

Win with 5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2023 Postseason · Memphis

Games

13

Havoc Plays / G

1.1

Efficiency

23.9

Usage

7.5

Consistency

51.5

Best Game by takeover score

North Texas

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Iowa State: 0. Bethune-Cookman: 0. Arkansas State: 0. Navy: 0. Missouri: 1. Boise State: 2. Tulane: 1. UAB: 1. North Texas: 5. South Florida: 1. Charlotte: 1. SMU: 0. Temple: 2

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Iowa State: 2 by 8.3. Bethune-Cookman: 2 by 8.3. Arkansas State: 3 by 12.5. Navy: 7 by 29.2. Missouri: 4 by 26.7. Boise State: 2 by 28.3. Tulane: 1 by 14.2. UAB: 7 by 39.2. North Texas: 4 by 66.7. South Florida: 3 by 22.5. Charlotte: 3 by 22.5. SMU: 1 by 4.2. Temple: 2 by 28.3

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins1.2 · Games = 10 · +0.5 vs Losses
Losses0.7 · Games = 3 · -0.5 vs Wins