Usage Score
8
Player Dossier
2019-2023Tennessee
Jacob Warren
TE • 6'6" • 253 lbs • Knoxville, TN, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Jacob Warren reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
63.4
Consistency
29.2
Season Value
50.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season · Tennessee
192021222323
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Tennessee
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Vanderbilt
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jacob Warren, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season · Tennessee. Jacob Warren reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Jacob Warren played TE for Tennessee. Across 5 tracked seasons, Jacob Warren recorded 607 receiving yards and 8 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2023 with Tennessee.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season
Tennessee paired 179 primary output with 67.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2023 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 63.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Vanderbilt
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2023 Postseason · Tennessee
Games
10
Receiving Yards / G
19.1
Efficiency
63.4
Usage
8
Consistency
29.2
Best Game by takeover score
Iowa
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Iowa: 9. Virginia: 11. Unknown: 11. UTSA: 6. South Carolina: 26. Texas A&M: 7. Alabama: 14. Missouri: 17. Georgia: 8. Vanderbilt: 82
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Iowa: 1 by 60. Virginia: 1 by 73.3. Unknown: 1 by 73.3. UTSA: 2 by 20. South Carolina: 3 by 57.8. Texas A&M: 1 by 46.7. Alabama: 1 by 93.3. Missouri: 2 by 56.7. Georgia: 1 by 53.3. Vanderbilt: 3 by 100
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins23.5 · Games = 6 · +10.5 vs Losses
Losses13 · Games = 3 · -10.5 vs Wins
First Half12.6 · Games = 5 · -13.0 vs Second Half
Second Half25.6 · Games = 5 · +13.0 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Vanderbilt
Best efficiency game
100 vs Vanderbilt
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 1/1 | vs Iowa | W 35-0 | — | 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 11/25 | vs Vanderbilt | W 48-24 | — | 3 | 82 | 27.3 | 27.30 | 1 | 34 |
| Sat 11/18 | vs Georgia | L 10-38 | — | 1 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 11/11 | @ Missouri | L 7-36 | — | 2 | 17 | 8.5 | 8.50 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 10/21 | @ Alabama | L 20-34 | — | 1 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 10/14 | vs Texas A&M | W 20-13 | — | 1 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 1 | 7 |
| Sat 9/30 | vs South Carolina | W 41-20 | — | 3 | 26 | 8.7 | 8.70 | 1 | 10 |
| Sat 9/23 | vs UTSA | W 45-14 | — | 2 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 9/9 | vs Unknown | — | — | 1 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 9/2 | vs Virginia | W 49-13 | — | 1 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 1 | 11 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Tennessee
2019-2023
Opening stop
Season Progression
201920202021202220232023
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Regular Season | Tennessee | 1 | 6.7 | 6.3 | — |
| 2020 Regular Season | Tennessee | 73 | 60.6 | 8.2 | 72 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Tennessee | 179 | 67.6 | 11.9 | 106 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Tennessee | 163 | 68.8 | 6.4 | -16 |
| 2023 Postseason | Tennessee | 191 | 63.4 | 8 | 28 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Tennessee | 191 | 63.4 | 8 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Vanderbilt
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
82
Primary metric
82 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Texas A&M
33
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
33 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Florida
45
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
45 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Pittsburgh
55
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
55 receiving yards with a 73.3 efficiency score.
#5
Missouri
34
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
34 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2021 Regular Season · Tennessee
179 primary output · 67.6 efficiency · 11.9 usage
59.4
#2
2022 Regular Season · Tennessee
56.5
163 primary · 68.8 efficiency · 6.4 usage
#3
2023 Postseason · Tennessee
50.2
191 primary · 63.4 efficiency · 8 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2018 · Rating 0.8654
Farragut · Knoxville, TN
- Committed To
- Tennessee
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2018
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
607
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 31 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.