Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season
Ball State paired 354 primary output with 67.7 efficiency.
Player Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Regular Season | Ball State | 11 | 31 | 354 | 1 | 79 |
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season
Ball State paired 354 primary output with 67.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2023 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 67.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Kent State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 90.9th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
32.2
Efficiency
67.7
Usage
24.8
Consistency
65.6
Best Game by takeover score
Kent State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Georgia: 47. Indiana State: 32. Georgia Southern: 2. Western Michigan: 72. Eastern Michigan: 21. Toledo: 38. Central Michigan: 13. Bowling Green: 25. Northern Illinois: 32. Kent State: 50. Miami (OH): 22
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Georgia: 4 by 78.3. Indiana State: 2 by 100. Georgia Southern: 1 by 13.3. Western Michigan: 3 by 100. Eastern Michigan: 3 by 46.7. Toledo: 3 by 84.4. Central Michigan: 1 by 86.7. Bowling Green: 3 by 55.6. Northern Illinois: 5 by 42.7. Kent State: 2 by 100. Miami (OH): 4 by 36.7
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.