Usage Score
13
Player Dossier
2023-2023Mississippi State
Freddie Roberson
WR • 6'2" • 195 lbs • Seattle, WA, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Freddie Roberson reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
86.8
Consistency
50.1
Season Value
62.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season · Mississippi State
23
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 1
- Program Path
- Mississippi State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Florida
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Freddie Roberson, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season · Mississippi State. Freddie Roberson reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season
Mississippi State paired 149 primary output with 86.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2023 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 86.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Western Michigan
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2023 Regular Season · Mississippi State
Games
5
Receiving Yards / G
29.8
Efficiency
86.8
Usage
13
Consistency
50.1
Best Game by takeover score
Southern Miss
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. South Carolina: 11. Alabama: 23. Western Michigan: 68. Texas A&M: 19. Southern Miss: 28
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. South Carolina: 1 by 73.3. Alabama: 2 by 76.7. Western Michigan: 5 by 90.7. Texas A&M: 1 by 100. Southern Miss: 2 by 93.3
Split Comparison
Wins48 · n=2 · +30.3 vs Losses
Losses17.7 · n=3 · -30.3 vs Wins
First Half34 · n=3 · +10.5 vs Second Half
Second Half23.5 · n=2 · -10.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
5 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Western Michigan
Best efficiency game
100 vs Texas A&M
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Mississippi State
2023
Opening stop
Season Progression
2023
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Regular Season | Mississippi State | 149 | 86.8 | 13 | — |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Florida
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
62
Primary metric
62 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Western Michigan
68
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
68 receiving yards with a 90.7 efficiency score.
#3
UNLV
32
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
32 receiving yards with a 35.6 efficiency score.
#4
Oregon
33
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
33 receiving yards with a 73.3 efficiency score.
#5
Southern Miss
28
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
28 receiving yards with a 93.3 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2023 Regular Season · Mississippi State
149 primary output · 86.8 efficiency · 13 usage
62.1
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2020 · Rating 0.8317
Graham-Kapowsin · Graham, WA
- Committed To
- Eastern Washington
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2020
Career Facts
1
Career teams
1
Seasons tracked
149
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 1 tracked seasons, 8 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.