Player Stats

Hassan Beydoun College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
2,343
Receptions
216
Touchdowns
9

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2018 Regular SeasonEastern Michigan0-00-
2019 PostseasonEastern Michigan119113046.6
2019 Regular SeasonEastern Michigan1120232146.6
2020 Regular SeasonEastern Michigan540508079.3
2021 PostseasonEastern Michigan131183080.9
2021 Regular SeasonEastern Michigan1386932480.9
2022 PostseasonEastern Michigan13222060.2
2022 Regular SeasonEastern Michigan1348453460.2

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason

Eastern Michigan paired 1,015 primary output with 64.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

2022 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 60.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2022 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Ball State

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2022 Postseason · Eastern Michigan

Games

13

Receiving Yards / G

36.5

Efficiency

60.4

Usage

21.1

Consistency

63.4

Best Game by takeover score

Ball State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. San José State: 22. Eastern Kentucky: 48. Louisiana: 44. Arizona State: 6. Buffalo: 50. Massachusetts: 7. Western Michigan: 57. Northern Illinois: 2. Ball State: 85. Toledo: 35. Akron: 19. Kent State: 70. Central Michigan: 30

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. San José State: 2 by 73.3. Eastern Kentucky: 3 by 100. Louisiana: 5 by 58.7. Arizona State: 1 by 40. Buffalo: 4 by 83.3. Massachusetts: 1 by 46.7. Western Michigan: 3 by 100. Northern Illinois: 3 by 4.4. Ball State: 10 by 56.7. Toledo: 5 by 46.7. Akron: 3 by 42.2. Kent State: 7 by 66.7. Central Michigan: 3 by 66.7

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins38.2 · Games = 9 · +5.5 vs Losses
Losses32.8 · Games = 4 · -5.5 vs Wins