Player Stats

Tanner Knue College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
1,865
Receptions
154
Touchdowns
17

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2019 Regular SeasonEastern Michigan0-00-
2020 Regular SeasonEastern Michigan627413473
2021 PostseasonEastern Michigan5435069
2021 Regular SeasonEastern Michigan528307169
2022 PostseasonEastern Michigan12340077.7
2022 Regular SeasonEastern Michigan1242591977.7
2023 Regular SeasonEastern Michigan1150479369.6

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason

Eastern Michigan paired 631 primary output with 78.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

2023 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 57 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2023 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Kent State

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2023 Regular Season · Eastern Michigan

Games

11

Receiving Yards / G

43.5

Efficiency

57

Usage

30.5

Consistency

45.6

Best Game by takeover score

Kent State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Howard: 73. Minnesota: 21. Massachusetts: 25. Central Michigan: 68. Ball State: 23. Kent State: 85. Northern Illinois: 10. Western Michigan: 66. Toledo: 22. Akron: 79. Buffalo: 7

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Howard: 8 by 60.8. Minnesota: 4 by 35. Massachusetts: 3 by 55.6. Central Michigan: 7 by 64.8. Ball State: 3 by 51.1. Kent State: 5 by 100. Northern Illinois: 2 by 33.3. Western Michigan: 5 by 88. Toledo: 3 by 48.9. Akron: 8 by 65.8. Buffalo: 2 by 23.3

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins48.7 · Games = 6 · +11.3 vs Losses
Losses37.4 · Games = 5 · -11.3 vs Wins