Usage Score
12.9
Player Profile
QB • 6'2" • 225 lbs • Maryville, TN, USA
Dylan Hopkins is a balanced quarterback profile with 12.9 usage in the latest tracked season.
Usage Score
12.9
Efficiency
57.4
Consistency
81.6
Season Value
62.8
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · UAB
Quick Facts
Dylan Hopkins, QB. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · UAB. Dylan Hopkins is a balanced quarterback profile with 12.9 usage in the latest tracked season.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season
UAB paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2023 Regular Season role shape
pass-led usage with 57.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across UAB, New Mexico.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Game with 282 yards of offense and 70.7 efficiency. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Primary Metric / G
199.8
Efficiency
57.4
Usage
12.9
Consistency
81.6
Best Game by takeover score
Utah State
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Texas A&M: 115. Unknown: 282. New Mexico State: 263. Massachusetts: 206. Wyoming: 187. San José State: 206. Hawai'i: 208. Nevada: 277. UNLV: 189. Fresno State: 154. Utah State: 111
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas A&M: 27 by 46.4. Unknown: 20 by 70.7. New Mexico State: 43 by 61. Massachusetts: 25 by 66.1. Wyoming: 36 by 58.8. San José State: 33 by 55.9. Hawai'i: 28 by 66.8. Nevada: 37 by 51. UNLV: 27 by 59.5. Fresno State: 24 by 51.9. Utah State: 33 by 43.1
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Unknown
Best efficiency game
70.7 vs Unknown
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/24 | vs Utah State | L 41-44 | 12 | 31 | 125 | 38.7 | 0 | 0 | 43.1 | 2 | -14 | -7 | 0 | 0 |
| Sun 11/19 | @ Fresno State | W 25-17 | 8 | 18 | 124 | 44.4 | 0 | 2 | 51.9 | 6 | 30 | 5 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 11/4 | vs UNLV | L 14-56 | 15 | 23 | 187 | 65.2 | 0 | 0 | 59.5 | 4 | 2 | 0.50 | 0 | 11 |
| Sun 10/29 | @ Nevada | L 24-34 | 18 | 34 | 271 | 52.9 | 1 | 3 | 51 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 10/21 | vs Hawai'i3+ TD | W 42-21 | 20 | 25 | 202 | 80.0 | 3 | 0 | 66.8 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 10/14 | vs San José State | L 24-52 | 13 | 24 | 187 | 54.2 | 0 | 1 | 55.9 | 9 | 19 | 2.10 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 9/30 | @ Wyoming | L 26-35 | 14 | 30 | 151 | 46.7 | 1 | 1 | 58.8 | 6 | 36 | 6 | 0 | 48 |
| Sat 9/23 | @ Massachusetts | W 34-31 | 9 | 17 | 192 | 52.9 | 1 | 0 | 66.1 | 8 | 14 | 1.80 | 1 | 19 |
| Sun 9/17 | vs New Mexico State | L 17-27 | 20 | 39 | 247 | 51.3 | 1 | 0 | 61 | 4 | 16 | 4 | 0 | 17 |
| Sun 9/10 | vs Unknown3+ TD | — | 13 | 17 | 273 | 76.5 | 4 | 1 | 70.7 | 3 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 9/2 | @ Texas A&M | L 10-52 | 15 | 24 | 115 | 62.5 | 0 | 1 | 46.4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
UAB
2018-2022
Opening stop
New Mexico
2023
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Regular Season | UAB | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2019 Regular Season | UAB | 780 | 41.9 | 17.3 | 780 |
| 2020 Regular Season | UAB | 0 | — | — | -780 |
| 2021 Postseason | UAB | 2,293 | 64.1 | 18.6 | 2,293 |
| 2021 Regular Season | UAB | 2,293 | 64.1 | 18.6 | 0 |
| 2022 Postseason | UAB | 2,036 | 66 | 10.5 | -257 |
| 2022 Regular Season | UAB | 2,036 | 66 | 10.5 | 0 |
| 2023 Regular Season | New Mexico | 2,198 | 57.4 | 12.9 | 162 |
#1 Featured game
UTEP
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
259
Primary metric
259 total offense with 82.5 efficiency.
#2
Charlotte
334
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
334 total offense with 82.9 efficiency.
#3
Middle Tennessee
330
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
330 total offense with 87.2 efficiency.
#4
UTSA
290
Primary metric
Loss with 290 yards of offense and 71.6 efficiency.
290 total offense with 71.6 efficiency.
#5
Rice
309
Primary metric
Loss with 309 yards of offense and 58.5 efficiency.
309 total offense with 58.5 efficiency.
#1 Season by value score
2018 Regular Season · UAB
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2021 Postseason · UAB
64.7
2,293 primary · 64.1 efficiency · 18.6 usage
#3
2021 Regular Season · UAB
64.7
2,293 primary · 64.1 efficiency · 18.6 usage
8
250+ passing yards
3
300+ total offense
1
3+ takeover TD games
18
Above avg efficiency
Recruit Profile
Class 2018 · Rating 0.8004
Maryville · Maryville, TN
Career Facts
2
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
7,307
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 45 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.
Dylan Hopkins quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit