Player Stats

Kelechi Nwachuku College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
206
TFL
4.5
Sacks
1
Passes defended
10

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2019 Regular SeasonUTSA123610-3026.7
2020 Regular SeasonUTSA1055-0-3027.3
2021 PostseasonUTSA11510--019.3
2021 Regular SeasonUTSA1127-0-1019.3
2022 PostseasonUTSA113-0--044.8
2022 Regular SeasonUTSA11432.51-2044.8
2023 PostseasonUTSA135-0-1012.3
2023 Regular SeasonUTSA1332-0--012.3

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason

UTSA paired 6.5 primary output with 23.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

2023 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 12.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Marshall

Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2023 Postseason · UTSA

Games

13

Havoc Plays / G

0.1

Efficiency

12.6

Usage

2.2

Consistency

2.6

Best Game by takeover score

Marshall

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Marshall: 1. Houston: 0. Texas State: 0. Army: 0. Tennessee: 0. Temple: 0. UAB: 0. Florida Atlantic: 0. East Carolina: 0. North Texas: 0. Rice: 0. South Florida: 0. Tulane: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Marshall: 5 by 30.8. Houston: 1 by 4.2. Texas State: 1 by 4.2. Army: 3 by 12.5. Tennessee: 6 by 25. Temple: 4 by 16.7. UAB: 1 by 4.2. Florida Atlantic: 1 by 4.2. East Carolina: 2 by 8.3. North Texas: 3 by 12.5. Rice: 4 by 16.7. South Florida: 5 by 20.8. Tulane: 1 by 4.2

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.1 · Games = 9 · +0.1 vs Losses
Losses0 · Games = 4 · -0.1 vs Wins