Usage Score
7.2
Player Dossier
2018-2023UTSA
DL • 6'2" • 295 lbs • San Antonio, TX, USA
Brandon Matterson shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 18.7 disruption score.
Usage Score
7.2
Efficiency
18.7
Consistency
57.8
Season Value
31.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason · UTSA
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Brandon Matterson, DL. Best season Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason · UTSA. Brandon Matterson shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 18.7 disruption score.
Brandon Matterson played DL for UTSA. Across 6 tracked seasons, Brandon Matterson recorded 101 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2020 with UTSA.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason
UTSA paired 11 primary output with 18.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2023 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 18.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Tennessee
Loss with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
9
Havoc Plays / G
1.2
Efficiency
18.7
Usage
7.2
Consistency
57.8
Best Game by takeover score
Marshall
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Marshall: 2. Texas State: 0.5. Army: 0. Tennessee: 2.5. East Carolina: 2. North Texas: 2. Rice: 2. South Florida: 0. Tulane: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Marshall: 2 by 28.3. Texas State: 2 by 13.3. Army: 1 by 4.2. Tennessee: 4 by 41.7. East Carolina: 1 by 24.2. North Texas: 1 by 24.2. Rice: 1 by 24.2. South Florida: 1 by 4.2. Tulane: 1 by 4.2
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Tennessee
Best efficiency game
41.7 vs Tennessee
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 12/20 | @ Marshall | W 35-17 | 2 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 11/24 | @ Tulane | L 16-29 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/18 | vs South Florida | W 49-21 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/12 | vs Rice | W 34-14 | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/4 | @ North Texas | W 37-29 | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/28 | vs East Carolina | W 41-27 | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/23 | @ Tennessee | L 14-45 | 4 | 1 | — | 1.50 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 9/15 | vs Army | L 29-37 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/9 | vs Texas State | W 20-13 | 2 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
UTSA
2018-2023
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Regular Season | UTSA | 1.5 | 11.3 | 3 | — |
| 2019 Regular Season | UTSA | 2 | 10.6 | 3.6 | 0.5 |
| 2020 Postseason | UTSA | 6.5 | 21.1 | 6.7 | 4.5 |
| 2020 Regular Season | UTSA | 6.5 | 21.1 | 6.7 | 0 |
| 2021 Postseason | UTSA | 2.5 | 10.1 | 3.8 | -4 |
| 2021 Regular Season | UTSA | 2.5 | 10.1 | 3.8 | 0 |
| 2022 Regular Season | UTSA | 0.5 | 12.7 | 3.3 | -2 |
| 2023 Postseason | UTSA | 11 | 18.7 | 7.2 | 10.5 |
| 2023 Regular Season | UTSA | 11 | 18.7 | 7.2 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Florida Atlantic
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3
Primary metric
3 disruption/tackle impact with 54.4 takeover score.
#2
Tennessee
2.5
Primary metric
Loss with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 54.3 takeover score.
#3
Western Kentucky
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 49.9 takeover score.
#4
UAB
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 42.3 takeover score.
#5
Army
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 42.3 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2023 Postseason · UTSA
11 primary output · 18.7 efficiency · 7.2 usage
31.1
#2
2023 Regular Season · UTSA
31.1
11 primary · 18.7 efficiency · 7.2 usage
#3
2020 Postseason · UTSA
15.7
6.5 primary · 21.1 efficiency · 6.7 usage
0
Impact games
1
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2018 · Rating 0.8255
Brandeis · San Antonio, TX
Career Facts
1
Career teams
9
Seasons tracked
101
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 9 tracked seasons, 46 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.