Player Stats

Trumane Bell II College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
64
TFL
23.5
Sacks
13.5
QB hurries
12

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2019 Regular SeasonUTSA22102-032.8
2020 Regular SeasonUTSA91364.51-050.1
2021 Regular SeasonUTSA11197.553-052.5
2022 PostseasonUTSA10111--049.8
2022 Regular SeasonUTSA10184.514-049.8
2023 PostseasonUTSA81111-029.4
2023 Regular SeasonUTSA8102.511-029.4

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season

UTSA paired 15.5 primary output with 19.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

2023 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 15.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Texas State

Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2023 Postseason · UTSA

Games

8

Havoc Plays / G

0.9

Efficiency

15.1

Usage

3.9

Consistency

21.4

Best Game by takeover score

Texas State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Marshall: 3. Houston: 0. Texas State: 3. Army: 1. Temple: 0. UAB: 0.5. North Texas: 0. Tulane: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Marshall: 1 by 34.2. Houston: 2 by 8.3. Texas State: 2 by 38.3. Army: 2 by 18.3. Temple: 2 by 8.3. UAB: 1 by 9.2. Tulane: 1 by 4.2

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins1.3 · Games = 5 · +1.0 vs Losses
Losses0.3 · Games = 3 · -1.0 vs Wins